If you’re going to make a registry of Muslims… make a registry of all pro-lifers. They could shoot up a Planned Parenthood.

the-anarcho-raver:

alwaystruenorth:

rose-in-a-fisted-glove:

avienbgwp:

rose-in-a-fisted-glove:

lexluthor-is-bae:

destroy-the-fucking-patriarchy:

¯_(ツ)_/¯

THOSE WERE ONLY A COUPLE OF INCIDENTS YOU ASSHOLE! Compared to the MAAAANY terrorist attacks by radical muslims

Wow. Can we just appreciate this cognitive dissonance here.
“Only a couple of incidents” versus ‘many attacks by radical Muslims’

Like, they aren’t even denying that pro-lifers have blown up clinics but it’s different because it supposedly happened less times within the US than attacks by radical Muslim extremists.

I’m not sure why you said “supposedly” when it is less.

According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, 13 wounded,[12] 100 butyric acid stink bomb attacks, 373 physical invasions, 41 bombings, 655 anthrax threats,[13] and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers. 

Meanwhile, between 1970 and today there have been a grand total of 13 terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists within the US and 8 in Canada. 

So, even if you only count the terrorist attacks in which damage was done. You’re looking at 587 successful terrorist attacks from pro-lifers (not included death and anthrax threats) and 21 terrorist attacks from extreme Muslim fundamentalists. 

That is why supposedly is there. 

Pro-lifers are quantitatively, significantly, statistically, a larger threat to public peace than Muslim extremists. 

FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK:

Pro-lifers are quantitatively, significantly, statistically, a larger threat to public peace than Muslim extremists.

I couldn’t NOT share this..

nabyss:

profeminist:

profeminist:

afunnyfeminist:

refinery29:

This is what a real, qualified OBGYN will tell you about what women feel when they get an abortion

Dr. Willie Parker, who is trained as a gynecologist and OBGYN, is a hero for the pro-choice movement because he’s honest about the undiscussed aspects of getting (or not getting) an abortion. Watch how he gives a consultation.

That last statement about regret is so important, because so many people don’t understand what it is or what causes it. Anti-choicers exploit this by manipulating pregnant people and creating doubt, which only increases the likelihood of regret, no matter what decision the pregnant person makes. You know what is best for you, even if it takes some time to figure it out.

image

More posts on Dr. Willie Parker

Good man. He should be careful you never know with those crazies. Toupee being potus is empowering them.

howprolifeofyou:

afunnyfeminist:

rachelbt2008:

protego-et-servio:

antichoice-compassion:

rachelbt2008:

antichoice-compassion:

rachelbt2008:

did y’all know that there is scientific research that confirms a link between getting an abortion and it making you more likely to get breast cancer?

Where? Because that’s not what the American Cancer Society says.

I only posted about it so people could do research if they would like to. Here’s a few different links:
http://cradlemyheart.org/2013/08/05/why-you-still-dont-know-about-the-abortion-breast-cancer-link/actions
http://americanrtl.org/abortion-breast-cancer
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/17/pediatricians-warn-of-abortion-breast-cancer-link/
It apparently has something to do with the way the breast tissue matures with pregnancy that leaves it more susceptible to breast cancer. But I’m not a scientist so I don’t know.

Oh my god you included a link to breitbart. Yeah, none of these sites are biased or anything. Definitely not.

First link is broken.

Second link is “American Right to Life.” Not unbiased.

Third link is Breitbart. While glancing through it, they reference the studies from Asian countries which, most of which are extremely old, have been debunked, or found no causation of breast cancer and abortion.

If I may copy-pasta from another incident: 

It takes until number 36 to get to a study done in the year 2000. So, most of the studies are outdated. (Giving you almost two decades is a huge leeway, anyway. Even further, a lot of the data compiled from these are from before 2000, too.)

37. Reports no connection between induced abortion and breast cancer.

38. These results suggest a history of several induced abortions has little influence on breast cancer risk in Chinese women.

39. Abortions, as they are performed in China, are not an important cause of breast cancer.

40. No evidence was found for breast cancer being connected to abortion.

41. “Our results do not support the hypothesis that induced abortion or miscarriage increase the breast cancer risk of young women.”

42. This study says the “non-statistically significant increase in risk of breast CIS associated with induced abortion … may reflect incomplete reporting by control subjects who had an abortion before 1973 or those who regularly undergo mammographic screening.”

43. “Our conclusions indicate induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk in African-American women.”

44. This study says women who induce abortions may be at reduced risk of cancer of the corpus uteri.

45. This one said there was a connection, however, reading through the abstract, I’m not sure if the study used records from 1382 or if that’s me reading it wrong… Plus this one is from Iran. Whatever, I’ll give it to you. (1)

46. Also found a connection. This one is also from Iran. (2)

47.CONCLUSION: These results provide strong evidence that there is no relationship between incomplete pregnancy and breast cancer risk.

48. This study did not find any connection between abortion and breast cancer.

49. There was no mention of abortion in this one…

50. Something to the tune of: “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be associated with breast cancer. The discrepancies between our findings and other studies might be due to the different characteristics of Turkish women that merit further investigation.” (3)

51. These findings suggested an increased risk. (4)

52. “Each year delay in first pregnancy increased risk, as did induced abortion.” However, “our findings imply the need for further investigation.” (5)

53. This one suggested that there was a relationship in Jiangsu’s women of China. (6)

54. “An increased number of either spontaneous or induced abortions was not associated with an increased BC risk.”

55. This study did show an increase, however it notes that other studies conflict with its findings. (7)

56. This study mostly references other studies when it comes to abortion and breast cancer. The conclusion of this study is saying that non-vegetarian diets are an important risk factor, when it comes to breast cancer, as is literacy. (If you’re more literate, you’re more likely to get breast cancer.)

I won’t count this one, because it’s mostly referencing other studies.

57. No mention of induced abortion, or even miscarriages.

58. This one saying that there’s an increase of breast cancer risk with the number of induced abortions. This one did not have a specific study, though. It’s a “meta-analysis.” Meaning it took various articles and elaborated from the findings. The citations weren’t done in chronological order, but they were splayed over various decades. Since it’s probably using studies we’ve already touched upon, I’m not going to count this one either.

So, from number 37 to 58, only 7 studies claim to find an actual connection between induced abortion and breast cancer. A few of the studies say more research is necessary and that there were conflicting findings about the connection of abortion and breast cancer.

Regardless, you might want to double-check your research before pulling a random list off the Internet.

The American Cancer association does not feel there’s any scientific backing to say abortion increases risk of breast cancer. (They offer plenty of citations.)

Like I have said, multiple times now, I just put it out there for others to look into and come to their own conclusions. Do whatever you want, add whatever other information you want to it, because whether it’s true or not, women deserve to know the truth either way, right?

Why can’t you just admit that you posted falsehoods thinking they were true, until some very polite people educated you on the topic, as well as teaching you to separate science from propaganda? If you were truly interested in getting the truth out there, you would be thanking the people who responded with the truth and promise to do better research so you don’t spread lies. People can draw their own conclusions when both sides are supplying facts to a discussion. But posting lies and sticking by those lies is purposely misleading people and manipulating them through fear.

“did y’all know that there is scientific research that confirms a link between getting an abortion and it making you more likely to get breast cancer?” Is the exact OP, right there in plain black and white.

Saying that it “”“confirms a link”“” is not the same as “ I just put it out there for others to look into and come to their own conclusions.” Just admit you were wrong and move on.

noregretsjust-love:

Here’s the thing about being pro-choice, you don’t have to morally agree with abortion to be pro-choice. It is not called pro-abortion. Pro-choice simply means you understand that you can not make such an intimate decision for someone else and that they have full control of making their own decisions.

I am a volunteer patient escort at planned parenthood

shitantichoiceprotesterssay:

maggierumplefrank:

This is something I just shared on FB about my experiences as a patient escort. Just thought I’d put it on here too.

Alright y’all. Prepare for a long post, but one you should read.

Some of you know, but some of you don’t, that I volunteer at Planned Parenthood about twice a month. My official title is Volunteer Clinic Escort. My role is to safely get patients and family into the clinic safely, with privacy, and with a friendly face. Not all Planned Parenthoods (PP) have these, but the clinic where I volunteer does because we have loud, abrasive, volatile, threatening, verbally abusive and dishonest anti-choice protesters who harass people in the clinic. I would like to tell you about my experiences with them and with patients who talk to me as I stand outside with my umbrella and vest.

(I would like to note that this is not the place to tell me that abortion is wrong, that I should not support PP, that I need to stop what I’m doing. I’ve heard every argument before. In fact, I’ve had every arguement screamed in my face. You’re welcome to your opinion, but I will not be acknowledging it on here, and I ask that others ignore dissenters too. This post isn’t about me and why you think I’m wrong. It’s about what I see every time I volunteer.)

When I am volunteering, I am outside and often have patients and family members talk with me. I’m obviously not there to counsel or to offer advice medically one way or another, but I am a friendly ear and people just need to talk sometimes. Also, when volunteering, patients entering the clinic are verbally harassed by the anti choice protesters almost immediately and, while we don’t encourage it, they often yell back. The protesters don’t listen.

On my very first day, I had a person head into the clinic. As I smiled to her and went to get the door, an anti-choice protester (ACP) yelled “Mama! Don’t kill your baby!” The patient immediately responded tearfully “my baby is dead. My baby is falling out of me right now. I didn’t do anything.” The ACP, without missing a beat, screamed back through her child-sized megaphone “No he isn’t! Your doctor lied to you! These murderers just want your money!” I ushered in the patient as gently as I could while my co-volunteer told her kindly that those people didn’t matter and that in a week they wouldn’t even remember what they heard here.

In the year and a half I’ve been doing this, we have had a ACP sneak into the clinic and threaten to burn the place down. The police did nothing. We had two other ACPs try and enter the clinic to tell patients they would adopt their babies. We told them to get off the property and when they didn’t, we called the police. Eventually the ACP returned to the narrow strip of lawn they stand on at the edge of the parking lot, and luckily so, because the police never showed again.

My clinic, luckily, has never faced extreme violence while I was there. But other PP and health care clinics are not so lucky. They are burned down, have bombs planted, have clinic escorts and workers physically harmed.

They are shot at and three people die.

I have had patients tell me that they will be killed by their partner if they have an abortion. I have been told that their partner will kill them if they DON’T have one. I’ve been told how people with physical disabilities cannot carry a child without side effects so severe they may not survive. I’ve had patients explain that their mental health is at risk if they go through with the pregnancy. I’ve had patients come in with a wanted pregnancy that ended in miscarriage and they needed PPs help to safely remove the tissue. I’ve seen people come in who admit to being addicted to drugs and know they cannot go through this pregnancy.

Planned Parenthood helped all these people, not just with medical care, but with helping abused patients find help to escape violent partners. Helping those who want to conceive find fertility doctors. Helping drug addicts find resources to become healthy.

All the while, the ACP stand outside, screaming and hollering, telling women that they are murderers and whores and that they will burn for murdering their babies. But it’s ok, they do it out of love. They scream at these people and tell them awful things and then beg to have the patient come talk with them.

They don’t see the hypocrisy.

It is a rule to not engage with the ACP at all. In the year and a half I’ve been doing this, I’ve said maybe a total of 50 words to the group, all of which are some form of “you are on our property, step back right now.” I may not engage them, but we can make eye contact and make them believe we are listening. We do this so the ACP begins shouting at me, and not a patient getting air outside. I would much rather be shouted at than have them scream at a patient.

When I am being yelled at, I have been called: a murderer, a nazi, a slavery supporter, a bad mother, a bad wife (they do not know if I am married or if I have children), a witch, a lesbian, a liberal, a member of satan’s army, a Muslim lover, a bitch, a slut, and evil. Some of these things are true and some are perfectly fine things to be, but to the ACP they are all bad.

Sometimes we have patient partners come talk to the protesters. They try and explain to the ACP why they are there with their partner. I’ve heard them tell the ACP every single reason, and every single time, the protesters still tell them they are wrong and a bad father and a supporter of Satan. Every. Time. And they call this love.

Since Trump took office, one of his first orders signed was a Global Gag Rule. People thought that this rule meant that no US money would go to pay for abortions overseas, but in fact, US funds have never paid for abortions and haven’t since 1973. Even in the US, because of the Hyde Amendment, no federal funding goes to pay for abortions.

What this gag rule now does, however, is prevent money from going to clinics that even mention abortion as a method of family planning. They don’t have to perform them. If they are mentioned at all in pamphlets or classes, they lose foreign aid money. This means that now they can’t provide birth control, wellness checks, prenatal care, or classes.

This will cause unwanted pregnancies. This will cause people to seek out abortions, often in unsafe condition.

This will cause people to die.

Roughly 1/3 people with a uterus will have an abortion in their life. I haven’t spoken to everyone who has had one, but I’ve spoken to more than most. No one gets an abortion out of malice. No one gets an abortion just to end the life of a fetus, just for kicks. No. One.

Planned Parenthood provides important health services, including abortion. They do this despite the risk of physical bodily harm, every day. People like myself stand outside PP to protect patients because it is important.

We. Will. Not. Stand. Down.

I will continue to volunteer, even though since Trump was elected, the ACP have gotten more and more aggressive in their tactics, since they believe Trump supports their actions. I will continue to walk these patients inside, to get help, because it is important and right. I will continue to fight Trump the slew of anti choice people supporting him. I will continue to support choice even though I know I will lose friends and will face hatred from people I know.

Planned Parenthood is important, and we will not stand down.

❤ ❤ ❤

I got pregnant three years ago. I was 22, it was a brand-new relationship, but I was adamant that I was having a baby. I’ve always taken motherhood very seriously. I was abused — the product of people who shouldn’t have had kids — then adopted. I felt so strongly that this was the most important job of my life.

I wasn’t at risk of genetic defects, so during the anatomy scan it didn’t even occur to me that they were looking for abnormalities. Me, my boyfriend, and my parents all went to the appointment, and when they said I was having a girl, my mom jumped up and down hollering as if she were at a football game. My boyfriend cried.

I was home alone when I got a call from the genetic specialist who told me that the tests were positive for trisomy 13. I thought that was Down syndrome and thought, Okay, I can do that. But then she started apologizing: “I’m so sorry, these babies usually miscarry. It’s a miracle she’s made it this far.” I said I didn’t understand, and she explained that my baby could pass any day, be still-born, or die soon after. I Googled “trisomy 13” and saw horrific pictures of babies without noses or mouths. I sat there and sobbed while I held my belly apologizing to her over and over and over again. I called my mom and said, “My baby’s going to die. My baby’s going to die.”

The doctor cleared her schedule and saw me later that day. She said: “You need to make a decision. You’re already 23 weeks and the state of Ohio has restrictions that impact your options.” She explained I could terminate or carry the pregnancy to its extent. At the time, 24 weeks was the cutoff for abortion in Ohio or else you had to travel to another state. [In December 2016, Republican governor John Kasich signed a law that reduced this cutoff to 20 weeks.] We only had days to decide, and even then there were waiting lists and the expense was horrendous. I had never felt so alone.

The counselor said my baby wasn’t in pain and there was no risk to either of our lives if we continued the pregnancy. I thought, Let’s try to make some memories while we can. I really enjoyed being pregnant. I loved having this purpose, and I thought as long as she’s not suffering, I think that her being here with us right now is the best we can do. And so … we tried.

At 29 weeks, my ankles and legs got extremely swollen. I was disassociating and became lightheaded, so I left work. I started cramping and ended up in the hospital. There were so many tests, which ultimately concluded that this was an emergency situation. [Jessica was at risk of having a seizure, and potentially dying, if labor wasn’t induced.] I wasn’t thinking, I’m terminating this pregnancy in order to save my life, but that’s what my paperwork said.

The doctor was very clear. He said, “You need to decide whether you want to induce now or come back in a week and get your blood pressure checked again — and I will induce you then.” I lived 45 minutes away from any hospital, on a farm without neighbors. It was a bitterly cold January. He was afraid I’d have a seizure and not get to them in time. That worried me, too.

But I knew that if I was induced, there was no chance my daughter would survive. Even if I carried her to term, her survival rate was very low, less than 5 percent. Another decision I had to make was telling the doctors that I did not want them to resuscitate the baby.

I was in labor for 32 hours.

I declined to have her monitored during labor because I didn’t want to sit there listening to her pass away. So they’d periodically come in and quietly listen for a heartbeat. The last time, at 1 a.m., they couldn’t hear it. I made them bring my family back into the room, and about a half an hour later it was time. She was born after three pushes, and at just two and a half pounds. Her heart was still beating, but she didn’t cry or breathe or make any sort of sound. There was mention of oxygen, but I said, “Please, just let her go.” They put her on my chest, and my boyfriend came and cut the cord.

She stayed alive for two and a half hours. They called it when her heart stopped.

When I made the decision to “voluntarily” induce, I felt like I was picking myself over my child. I wouldn’t wish that on the most evil person on Earth. A funeral director arrived with a huge white cloth. He said, “I have to cover her face so people don’t know when I’m walking down the hall [with such a small body].” I handed her over, and that was the last time that I saw her. I didn’t want a casket on display at the funeral; that tiny box would have been way too much. I collected her ashes a week later.

Many people don’t understand why this experience reinforced my pro-choice beliefs. Now more than ever, I firmly believe: No conditions. No restrictions. I can’t imagine being in that situation and being denied the dignity of making a choice. That little bit of control was so empowering. Nobody just wakes up after being pregnant for over 20 weeks and says, “I don’t want to do this anymore.”

When Trump said those things about late-term abortion during the debate, I was so angry. What must the rest of the world think of us? I have friends in the U.K. and Canada saying, “What the hell? You can have 30 guns but you can’t have a dignified, comfortable abortion?”

And while we’re getting abortions and making painful decisions about our bodies, Trump is fucking tweeting.

Jessica, who had an abortion after 24 weeks, rural Ohio, What Abortion Looks Like In America Right Now (via gorandomshesaid)

teratomarty:

my-feminism:

In the Netherlands, abortion is freely available on demand. Yet the Netherlands boasts the lowest abortion rate in the world, about 6 abortions per 1000 women per year, and the complication and death rates for abortion are miniscule. How do they do it? First of all, contraception is widely available and free — it’s covered by the national health insurance plan. Holland also carries out extensive public education on contraception, family planning, and sexuality. An ethic of personal responsibility for one’s sexual activity is strongly promoted. Of course, some people say that teaching kids about sex and contraception will only encourage them to have lots of sex. But Dutch teenagers tend to have less frequent sex, starting at an older age, than American teenagers, and the Dutch teenage pregnancy rate is 9 times lower than in the U.S.

I endorse evidence-based medicine, and evidence-based activism.