alarajrogers:

adultprivilege:

who-gives-a-ship:

First batch of easy answer images.

Easy to make and easy to use! Save these pictures and the next time an anti tries an overused argument, you’ve got an answer ready to go. Just post the picture instead of typing the same thing over and over again. Free for anyone to use with or without credit.

Thanks to @ship-is-love, @shipping-isnt-morality, @forest-of-stories, and @shippingisnotactivism for their contributions.

Some of these are good takes and some of these are trash takes. Like the idea that adults created fandom? Bitch, fandom is a collective enterprise, we all created fandom, STFU. Or the idea that NSFW and not safe for minors are synonymous. I wrote smut when I was 16. Or the idea that pedophilic art can’t support pedophilia. Listen, the problem with pedophilic art, or rapey art, or etc etc etc is that most people think these things are terrible horrible things on paper, but like, when they actually happen, people don’t even see it as a crime, because it’s so normal. Like prom rape. Like sure, write what you want, but media has an impact, and you should create art that makes the impact you want. Fun fact, did you know that designated drivers were invented by the media? There’s writing what you want, and there’s media illiteracy.

Adults created fandom in the sense that fandom’s been an ongoing enterprise for 50 years and therefore the vast majority of fandom creators are adults. Children and teenagers are certainly creators within fandom, but the “adults created fandom” meme is generally used as a response to the idea that adults should quietly bow out of fandom and let the kids have it… which I can’t help but think is an idea that was actually created by people who really do want to prey on and warp the opinions of young people and thus want to cut them off from having friends and mentors who are adults and don’t lie about it. Because I’ve never seen it before. My generation didn’t attack adults for existing in spaces that kids also exist in and neither did the 90′s kids and neither did the teens in the 00′s; the “grownups should get out of our sandbox!” attitude is ahistorical and bizarre, and comes at a time when there is plenty of evidence that various groups are trying to radicalize teens against things that were previously commonly accepted.

Agreed on “nsfw does not mean not safe for minors”, but in today’s environment where adults get called pedophiles for having friends who are teens, don’t expect many adults to feel safe standing up for that opinion. I’ve been arguing it my whole life, under my real name, so I’m willing to continue to say it. I feel that teens should have the legal right to consume whatever porn they want, because they can’t get STDs or get their heart broken or get pregnant by porn, and if hormones are raging and kids want to experiment with sex I’d much rather they did it in their own bedroom with the assistance of porn than to be exploited by an older person who just wants to get their own rocks off… and I think porn in fandom, where bad stuff gets tagged, is probably a lot safer and less likely to teach bad attitudes than mainstream porn is. Unfortunately, the way the law currently works, adults need to be very careful about allowing teens access to porn, because an adult who encourages someone they know is a minor to read fic containing sex could be charged with a serious crime. 

The impact of fiction on reality is real but in general, in fandom, it doesn’t go quite the way people assume that it does. The fact that fandom expects you to identify that what is happening in your story or art is rape, and thus tag it, actually helps to prevent the kind of normalization of rape that you’re talking about when you bring up that “prom rape” is treated as if it’s not rape at all. What is bad about rape in fiction is not that it exists – rape is a real thing and like all real things, writers and artists have the right to engage with it – but when it’s treated as if it isn’t rape. Well, “write/draw what you want but tag it properly” is actually a direct counter to this. 

When the book Lolita came out, many reviewers (I am guessing, most of them male, given the time period) called it a love story. I am not joking. If Vladimir Nabokov had had the ability to post tags on his novel like “Underage, Child Abuse, Rape”, idiots might not have been able to widely promote the idea that the book is actually positive on the concept of pedophilia or that the writer sincerely thought it was a love story. 

Everyone in society thinks they despise rape and child abuse, but when it actually happens, they turn a blind eye by claiming that what happened wasn’t rape or child abuse. Writing stories in which rape and/or child abuse take place and tagging it as such helps to teach people that no, those things that they were told weren’t rape or weren’t child abuse? Actually were. The story itself doesn’t even need to explicitly tell us that the thing in question is rape or child abuse; if it’s tagged correctly, it tells us that the author knows damn well that this is a terrible thing happening and expects you to agree. 

In my lifetime I’ve seen the proportion of casually rapey fanfic scenarios actually drop because instead of the standard within the community being that you only have to warn about “explicit sex” (of any type, so rape, consensual but rough BDSM, and loving vanilla sex are all the same) and same-sex relationships, nowadays you don’t warn about same-sex (you advertise, you don’t warn, because it’s not a bad thing people have to be cautioned about, but a thing some people are specifically looking for and some people are not. Like, you don’t warn that a book is science fiction but you do shelve it with the other sf books.) And you do warn about rape and rapeyness. I don’t think this change in community standards was driven by fandom itself, I think it was driven by social forces outside fandom and fandom just conformed to the new standards. But it does appear to have had an impact. I used to see a lot of fics that just didn’t seem to grasp the concept that what they were depicting was a bad thing, like the rape = love trope. That concept still exists, but now that people have to warn for it, I think there’s a lot more recognition that no, it’s still rape.

So yeah, “fiction doesn’t affect reality” is too simple a take, but “don’t ship pedophilic ships” is… a philosophy adopted by a bunch of people who really wanted support for their ship war, which has no concept of what pedophilia actually is and which actively denies teenagers any sexual agency and fails to recognize where the law actually falls. (I’ve seen people claiming that 17-year-old Peter Parker from Infinity War should not be shipped with Tony Stark because that’s pedophilia. It is not. The age of consent in New York, where both characters live, is 17. Is it gross? In my opinion, yes, very much so. Would I ship it? Hell no, I won’t even ship mentor/student if both are obvious adults. Is it pedophilia? No. Does it describe a relationship that’s illegal in the place where the characters live? Also no.) It’s a lot better to tell people they can ship what they want and then require that they tag things, because there are a lot of perfectly legal relationships that some people consider entirely morally acceptable that other people consider to be disgusting and predatory, so why not tell people (like me) that if they don’t want to read a ship with a big age gap between a very young adult and an old one, or with a mentor/student power differential, they can identify those with the tags and avoid them?

birlinterrupted:

The problem w blaming bi women dating men for their rates of abuse (other than the fact that’s it’s just like… cruel) is that bi women are twice as likely to be abused than women who only date men. And also that it’s the general sociological consensus that while severity is different, relationships between women have similar to slightly higher rates of IPV as m/f relationships. So you end up not only crowing over abused women (a really bad look) but you also erase same gender domestic violence which is actually an issue we need to address in our communities

goldstarprivilege:

muchymozzarella:

afunnyfeminist:

ghastderp:

i love sir patrick stewart more with each passing day.

See, guys. This is how you do it. Notice the words “Not all men are like that” are never spoken.

He knows men are like that

his father was like that to his mother

he has experienced the pain firsthand, of what it’s like when men are like that

and he never wants men to be like that again and he fights tooth and nail against the men who are still like that

And moreover, he acknowledges his privilege [as an older white male who is famous/well known] and uses it to speak up. He knows what he is, and he never has to say he’s not like those men he fights against—he never says it, his actions speak loud enough for everyone else to see it. 

Sir Patrick Stewart, everyone.

prideprejudce:

prideprejudce:

tbh i am disgusted that ariana grande had to actually disable her comments on twitter because so many people are blaming her for mac millers death from an overdose. like yes his death is immensely tragic and alcohol and drugs are a huge issue in society today but ariana was in no way obligated to stay with someone who was toxic for her health and well-being. and the people who are saying that it was her job to stay and “take care of him” and “save him” can fucking rot

Just an experiment. Reblog if you actually give a fuck about male victims of domestic violence and rape.

pixelz01:

heyhanlon:

yourlocalmoron:

glitchmoose:

i-thought-you-and-i:

404-sjw-logic-not-found:

probablyromanticrpgideas:

stuffie-kitten:

sanctuarywitch:

witchofthefuture:

witchofthefuture:

septiplie-der-pool:

glory-of-hera:

samurai-ko:

loganmcowen:

xaldien:

loganmcowen:

Of fucking course

What sick bastard doesn’t

“You’d be surprised”, said Xaldien, who just lost four followers and received a lovely “men can’t be raped” anon shortly after reblogging this the first time.

Yowch, disgusting.

If I don’t reblog this, assume I’m dead.

Always reblog this

If you Dont reblog this if u see it then i cant call u my friend

IF ANYONE TELLS ME THAT MEN CAN’T BE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE, I AM SICKENED BY THEIR MERE PRESENCE ON MY BLOG.

If you disagree with me, unfollow my blog, block me and never look at my blog again.

If you want to debate about this or send anon’s about this, I will reply but your actions have consequences.

Out of 19000+ followers I have, only one of you actually reblogged about this issue, yet a lot of you have reblogged and liked a picture by playboy about catcalling and that how men should never do it.

Additionally, I have received abuse in my ask box (which I will be answering when I can) and threats. In particular death threats and rape threats.

I can see the real problem here already. Male domestic violence and rape is just invisible in our society because we don’t want to talk about this because it just damages the status quo of this fucking website.

I’m a male victim of child sexual abuse. We matter. Please, reblog this.

Please never forget male victims are real and it can happen to everyone/anyone

Make sure the romance is there on both sides people

Support our men! These victims experiences are real and valid!

Men need our protection too!

STOP THE SILENCE. REBLOG FOREVER.

For as long as this reappears on my dash, I’m going to reblog it

please rb…

*breaks reblog button*

serakosumosu:

teenagecriminalmastermind:

inkskinned:

i have thought a lot about censorship and what is “appropriate”. not a lot of people know this, but lolita was written to show what we allow on our bookshelves: there being no swear words in it meant it was free from censorship. a book about child molestation was allowed because it didn’t explicitly use the word “fuck”. he wrote it to show we don’t really care about protecting children, and it ended up being seen as a romance.

someone once told me – actually, many people have – that lgbt content isn’t appropriate for children. any content. not just kissing. i’m drowned in questions: “won’t the parents have to explain it?” “kids shouldn’t be thinking about sex at this age, or do you think differently?” “what will the kids think?”

at six i saw disney movies. people kiss and get married. i didn’t ask “what does that mean.” i didn’t ask “are those people going to have sex?” i didn’t ask anything, because i was six, and no six year old thinks twice about these things. nobody ever “explained” being straight to me, it was a fact, and it existed, and i was fine with that. why would being gay require a thesis, i wonder.

someone once told me that the one of the reasons people hate lgbt individuals is because they can’t see us as anything but sexual. we’re not people, so much as sinners. that they don’t see love, they see sex. just sex. it’s perversion, not a matter of the heart. only of the body.

i think i was in my early twenties before i saw someone like me. 

how old were you, though, before you saw violence? before you saw sexual assault on tv? i think something like that is only pg-13, and if it’s implied, they can get away with anything. i remember watching things and learning about blood, but knowing sex – sex was what was really wrong. sex was always rated r. sex was always kind of a bad word. i was told a lot that i wasn’t ready.

i had a dream last night that i made a site where people could ask any question they wanted about sex and get answered by a professional. it was shut down in moments because 15 year olds wanted to know if it should hurt, if “double-bagging” was a real thing, if this, if that. we shudder. don’t let the children know about that! 

but at thirteen i had seen enough violence it no longer struck me. i couldn’t say “fuck” but i knew that if you break your femur, you can bleed out internally in under half an hour. in school i wasn’t allowed to write about loving girls because what would the administration think – but i could write about wanting to kill myself and people would say how lovely, how blistering.

i have thought a lot about censorship. sometimes people on this site try it with me: don’t write this, don’t be so nasty. some of it is intrinsic. we know as people with a uterus not to complain about “that time of the month”, we know better than to talk about sexual assault (how shameful), we know that talking about a vagina is somehow scandalous. i can say “dick” and nobody questions me. some people only refer to the bottom half of me by “pussy”. they won’t wrap a mouth around “vagina” like it’s poison to them. even discussing this, that the language halts, that there’s an intrinsic desire to say “girls” instead of “women” – feels naughty, illicit. not for children.

the other day someone suggested i make my blog 18+. i said, okay, it deals a lot with depression and other problems that might be for a mature audience. oh no, they said, that’s not it, i think that’s helpful. i said, okay. so what is it then. well, you’re gay. you write about loving women. and i said, i don’t write about sex often and they said. it’s not about the sex. but wlw isn’t for a general audience. teenagers aren’t ready.

oh.

lolita is recommended for high school and up. i think about that a lot. i know girls who love it, who say it speaks to them on a deep level. it’s beautiful prose, after all. that was the whole point of the novel. something that looked like a rose but was intrinsically awful. i think about how if i was a model they’d want me to look young, thin, prepubescent. how my body would be sold and how through the mall i walk by images of barely-clothed women while mothers cannot breastfeed in public without fear of retribution. 

i think about how i can write a novel about violence and it will be pg-13 but if my characters say “fuck” twice it’s inappropriate. i said fuck three times so far in this post, which makes it only appropriate for adults. 

i think about that, and how my identity is something that people suggest lines up with a swear word. that people shouldn’t talk about it. that it’s a vulgarity. bad for children, harsh, confusing.

fuck. i love women. which one makes this only for those over eighteen.

This is such a powerful post. Read it fully, and spread it around.

@deadcatwithaflamethrower

Not sure how true the bit about the reasons behind Lolita are. I’ve never read it as it squicks me. However, someone else noticed the type of website op mentions exists and I wanted to make sure the link was included with the post:

http://www.scarleteen.com

deliamelodyofficial:

goldaquarius:

thesunsword:

jehovahhthickness:

jessnesquik:

jehovahhthickness:

Stop dating abusive women 2018

Hardly any women are gonna reblog this tbh 🙃

A lot of women behave like this and think this ain’t abuse

But let a nigga slap them, damage their clothes and pour a drink on them, all hell will break loose.

EVERYONE CAN BE A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC ABUSE!

Buddy has the soul of an angel and composure out of this world

Just in case anyone wants the context: He has been making music in Chicago, he recently performed to a large audience and met London on da track, who offered him an opportunity in LA. She didn’t want to leave Chicago because of her business there. He told her that she doesn’t have to go, he just needs to do this for his music. She got upset because he straight up told her that he valued his career over their relationship and she did this. 

Now I’m not a relationship expert, but I will never understand how some of y’all expect people to put you above the shit they have to do. Always put your career, your job, your livelihood first. This was all kinds of fucked up, really fucking abusive and manipulative, he should definitely go to LA with or without her. 

Many women *WILL* reblog this, because part of feminism is acknowledging that women are just as capable of being abusive as men. Acting as though women cannot be abusive is misogyny, and relies on the misogynist tropes that women are frail, and innocent in comparison to men. Any true feminist must acknowledge that neither of these things are necessarily true and that a woman is in fact capable of being abusive whether it’s to another woman, a man, or a nonbinary person.

The reason we focus on abuse from men towards women is that it is more prevalent, and institutionally encouraged, justified, and allowed without consequence, while a woman even “talking back” to a man is to be “put in her place.”

Don’t bring your weak, fragile “Few women will reblog this” shit up in here. We know what abuse looks like when we see it.