i’m so tired of movies whose only real premise is “the best dude in the world at this non-white thing… is a white dude.” like The Last Samurai, where Tom Cruise is for some reason the only one who can properly understand samurai culture. i want the opposite of that. i want a movie where the best person in the world at this extremely white thing is a non-white person. Like imagine Aziz Ansari has to enter a bagpiping contest to save the honor of some teeny Scottish town and ends up marrying the stoic, humorless Scottish babe who is inexplicably good with swords. Or the fate of the American nation somehow depends on Li Bingbing learning how to play bluegrass. Or idk Canada’s hockey team has lost its coach and is going to suck and only the magic of Lupita Nyong’o can save them. Or maybe there’s a sports team from a country that doesn’t traditionally do the sport and oh I’m thinking of Cool Runnings. Let’s all rewatch Cool Runnings
…anyway has Aziz Ansari seen this post yet
Tag: fairness
This commercial is so positive
Yo y’all should see how much shit Adidas is getting for this commercial. Talking about how Adidas is pandering to the SJW market LMAO.
Please reblog if you are a girl and have ever been made to feel ashamed of one or more of these things (wanting to prove a point to some asshole):
-your weight
-your clothing choice
-your amount of make up
-having sex
-not having sex
-breast size
-having your period
-saying no
-not appreciating catcalls
-masturbating
-body hair
“Straight couples shouldn’t be at pride”
dragon-from-the-burning-mountain:
Well uh…
1.) one or both of people you see as a “straight couple” could be pan/bi/poly/ace
2.) one or both of them could be trans or non binary
3.) you could be misgendering someone
4.) They could be there to give moral support to a queer friend or family member who didn’t want to go alone.
Number four is important
5. They could be there because they support the cause stop fucking gatekeeping
6. They could be there in memory of a loved one, don’t forget Pride used to be a memorial as well as a celebration. I know a good number of straight people who go to Pride to celebrate the lives of friends and family who have died because they want to remember them as they lived, happy and joyful and surrounded by a community that loved them.
ALL OF THE FUCKING ABOVE.
😍😍😍
why you should not dismiss research unless you rly truly mean it
Internet, I am a queer researcher of queer health and I have something to say.
A few weeks back, a study went viral about the relationship between marriage equality policy and queer teen suicide rates, and a lot of people reacted thusly: “queer mental health is better when we’re not discriminated against! BREAKING: SKY IS BLUE, WATER IS WET”
This happens a lot. People see research about a thing ~Everyone Already Knows~ and they mock it. Now I want to make two things really clear:
1. Everyone does not already know.
2. This shit can lose these projects their funding.
Did you know that media coverage is a crucial factor in funding allocation? When we submit our application for grant renewal, we have to provide a list of news articles about our research so they can decide whether the public cares enough about us to let us keep doing our work. And most research doesn’t get all that much coverage, so individual reactions can really matter. If the primary reaction to our publications is eyerolling, we legitimately might not be able to continue.
I’ve seen some frustration from people who believe this research funding would be better put to use “actually helping” the affected populations instead of–I don’t know, pinning them under microscopes or whatever it is they think we do. But funding for policy initiatives is driven by research. I know you wish politicians would listen to individual voices telling them where the problems are, but that’s honestly not a smart way to direct limited resources. We need solid evidence. And a lot of the areas that need the most attention aren’t obvious–who knew bisexual people are at a much higher risk for physical and mental health disparities than gay and lesbian people? Who would have guessed that transgender folks are more likely than any other group (including straight people) to be military veterans, but overwhelmingly don’t claim their benefits? I’m sure some people noticed these patterns, but they definitely weren’t common knowledge within the queer communities I’ve grown up around, and those findings are leading to direct action as we speak.
I get that it can be frustrating to feel like your identity is being reduced to facts and figures for the benefit of red tape. But trust me, the researchers aren’t your enemy here. Most of us are queer too. All of us are just as frustrated by this crap as you are. We are doing our best, and I swear to you this work really is making a difference. Please don’t sabotage it.
I’m reblogging this because it only has 9 notes, and it should really, REALLY have a lot more.
Also, given the current US administration’s plan to stop collecting data on LGBTQ identities as part of the census, we are in need of accurate, useful data now more than ever.
Plus the ability to cite peer-reviewed evidence of these sorts of things and quantify the extent of “obvious” effects can be pretty important to researchers who are working in adjacent fields that don’t produce the sorts of headline soundbites that get mocked on social media.
And often headlines and summaries are misleading and reductive- a study about wage gaps across a variety of demographics might get headlined “Women Still Make Less Than Men, New Study Shows” when the bulk of the paper is about the intersection of race and gender identity, and I’ve seen people on Tumblr mocking a study about the flavor compounds in food across the Indian subcontinent, conducted by Indian scientists at an Indian university, as “LOL white people don’t know how to cook.”
And to add to this– it’s also important to be able to point to something and say, no, the problem is not that these people aren’t straight. Being able to point to actual science that says, “no, it’s not us, it’s you and how you treat us”– well, that’s a a good thing.
There are a lot of people out there who genuinely believe that being any
flavour of queer is intrinsically harmful to you. That unhappiness is a
natural result of being gay, that to be trans is to be mentally ill,
that bisexuals are confused and troubled. There are people who believe that you cannot be happy or well if you’re queer, and not all of those people are bad people. Some of them have what they perceive to be your best interests at heart, and they want you to be happy, to be well, to be physically, emotionally and mentally safe. And they still act in a way that causes harm, that damages lives, isolates kids and tells them that pain is what they should expect for being who they are.It’s important to be able to say, “these policies kill kids”, to say, “no, this wouldn’t have happened anyway”, to say, “yes, it does matter what you do.”
universalequalityisinevitable:
Peter Joseph on structural violence, from this video.
Brilliant
Spot on. Like Coretta Scott King said, I must remind you that starving a child is violence. Neglecting school children is violence. Punishing a mother and her family is violence. Discrimination against a working man is violence. Ghetto housing is violence. Ignoring medical need is violence. Contempt for poverty is violence.
60 year old historian Martin Bühler (who identified himself to the press, I do not identify activists without consent) appears to ‘photobomb’ a lot of media images of the G20 in Hamburg. In reality he is a long time observer documenting police brutality. In Hamburg he chose to cultivate the most non-activist ‘white bystander in a suit with a bike’ look he could manage and casually walked in front of police. As police slowed down or interrupted attacks and waited for the ‘bystander’ to get out of the way (being caught on camera trashing what look like bystanders is bad press after all), activists had time to regroup or retreat.
not all heroes wear capes
M’Baku Won’t Be Called Man-Ape In ‘Black Panther’
“We don’t call him Man-Ape,” executive producer Nate Moore said. “We do
call him M’Baku. Having a black character dress up as an ape, I think
there’s a lot of racial implications that don’t sit well, if done wrong.
But the idea that they worship the gorilla gods is interesting because
it’s a movie about the Black Panther who, himself, is a sort of deity in
his own right.”“You learn that M’Baku is essentially the head of the
religious minority in Wakanda and we thought that was interesting,”
Moore said. “Wakanda is not a monolithic place. They have a lot of
different factions.”Director Ryan Coogler also spoke about how M’Baku evolved as a
character when the writers began to treat Wakanda like it was an actual
place in Africa.“A lot of the writers who did some of the most
interesting work around the character, they treated Wakanda like a truly
African country,” Coogler said. “When you go to countries in Africa,
you’ll find several tribes, who speak their own languages, have their
own culture, and have distinct food and way of dress. They live amongst
each other, and together they make the identity of those countries.
That’s something we tried to capture. We wanted it to feel like a
country, as opposed to just one city or town.”“In M’Baku’s worldview, T’Chaka made a huge mistake going to the U.N.,”
Moore says. “‘We should never engage with the outside world. That’s a
terrible mistake. And if his son is anything like his father, I don’t
support him being on the throne.’ Politically, he just has different
ideology,” says Moore, who compares the mountain tribe to one of the
deadly rival “five families” in The Godfather. “Man-Ape is a problematic
character for a lot of reasons, but the idea behind Man-Ape we thought
was really fascinating. … It’s a line I think we’re walking, and
hopefully walking successfully.”… dare we hope that Marvel is (a) learning the value of worldbuilding and (b) losing a little of their tone-deafness? Marvel’s clearly aware that some of their older comics canon has not aged gracefully in terms of social mores, but they have at times put their foot squarely in their mouths when trying to do the right thing. Perhaps being up-front about what and why instead of doing damage control afterward is a sign of a lesson learned?
Dos and don’ts on designing for accessibility
Karwai Pun, GOV.UK:
The dos and don’ts of designing for accessibility are general guidelines, best design practices for making services accessible in government. Currently, there are six different posters in the series that cater to users from these areas: low vision, D/deaf and hard of hearing, dyslexia, motor disabilities, users on the autistic spectrum and users of screen readers.
[…] Another aim of the posters is that they’re meant to be general guidance as opposed to being overly prescriptive. Using bright contrast was advised for some (such as those with low vision) although some users on the autistic spectrum would prefer differently. Where advice seems contradictory, it’s always worth testing your designs with users to find the right balance, making compromises that best suit the users’ needs.
[github]