how about you dont use the word queer to describe lgbt!!! its a fucking slur!

vaspider:

jujubiest:

ace-and-ranty:

prismatic-bell:

hojabby:

I’m a qpoc, This is what I’m talking about when white people straight wash POC.

@hijabby may I hop on this post to make a point? You’re quite a bit younger than me, which isn’t a problem or a bad thing, it just means you will have still been in kindergarten or not even born yet when the events I am about to discuss took place and given the nature of queer history, it’s totally possible I learned stuff that’s faded into ephemera for your generation.

QUEER WAS THE ACCEPTABLE, ACADEMIC TERM FOR “LGBTQIA” IN THE EARLY-TO-MID 2000s.

I took classes in Queer Literature. We discussed Queer History. Some of my professors–who were themselves gay, lesbian, and bisexual, mind you–referred to historical figures as queer on the basis that those figures did not exist in societies that had a modern-day understanding of sexuality, and so trying to box them into modern labels is an exercise in futility. I went to marches where we screamed “we’re here, we’re queer, we want our civil rights.”

All of this, by the way, spawns out of the Genderqueer and ACT UP movements of the 1990s; they’re the ones who invented the chant on which the above chant was based, the one you may have heard elsewhere: “we’re here, we’re queer, get over it.” I’m proud of my own part in queer history, but those people, the ones who created the AIDS quilt and the die-ins and the fierce demands for same-sex marriage so they could visit partners dying in the hospital, they’re the real heroes. And they called themselves queer.

And?

Most of them were not white.

I am. The radical activism of my generation looks very different from generations past because, I’m sorry to say, white queer folks sat back and let queer folks of color do the hard part, and then we grabbed the baton and charged over the first big finish line while the sportscasters talked about the stunning race we’d run. I’m not sorry to be an activist or to be working in my own generation, but I’m very deeply sorry that queer activism en masse has widely ignored the nonwhite, noncis people who got us where we are.

“Queer” has more uses than just being a slur that was reclaimed 30+ years ago. Queer is a useful term if, say, you’re 15 and you’re not sure if you’re asexual or a late bloomer, but you don’t want to just say “oh yeah, I’m gay/straight.” Queer is a useful term if, like me, you escaped a fundamentalist church and your whole life has been defined by strict labels, and you just want out. Queer is a useful term if you’re from a country where gender doesn’t fit a Western binary but you want a quick term to describe yourself to Western people.

And do you know what else queer is?

Queer is hated by TERFs because it encompasses trans people.

Because it embraces aroace people.

Because it says “you are here, you are welcome, you belong” to people who say “I know I’m not straight, but I don’t know what I AM.” What you are is queer, and queer is enough. Queer is the place you can sit, rest, and figure it out at your own pace.

TERFs started the narrative of “queer is only a slur, has never been anything else, and was never reclaimed and you should never ever say it ever” in order to gatekeep our community. When you try to deny this term, YOU ARE DOING THE WORK OF TERFS.

Queer is not a slur. Queer is a reclaimed word that is of huge help to people across the community, but most especially to our fellows who aren’t “just” LGB, and to the nonwhite members of our community who do not fit into the gender binary.

Stop. STOP. Stop listening to TERFs who pretend nothing of queer rights existed between 1880 and 2015. Stop being ahistorical and disenfranchising.

We’re here, we’re queer, get the fuck over it.

I never head of TERFS rejecting queer for gatekeeping, but honestly? It sounds very likely, and Prismatic-Bell makes an important point.

I have seen aphobes do this exact thing first-hand. I’ve had an aphobe insist to me that I was homophobic for using the word queer to describe myself and my community (i.e. the community that is inclusive of aro/ace, trans, and multisexual people).

Aphobes really like to insist on LGBT or “gay” as the only acceptable umbrella terms, because that allows them to exclude aro/ace people while pretending to be more inclusive of bisexual and trans people than they actually are.

But oh, just wait five minutes, push them on their own internal logic a little bit, and they’ll show their true colors.

Hint: their true colors are TERF.

Queer is definitely still a slur in the UK, but I know that the LGBTQIA+ community is reclaiming it for themselves, so… yeah. The above still applies.

dynablade:

legend-of-laurel:

johnhexcarter:

yuurisviktor:

captainevans:

In case anyone hasn’t heard yet, now the GOP has introduced a bill that would pull the United States out of the U.N.

It’s called the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 and boy howdy that name alone is freightening

you know what actually i’m going to reblog this again. As of this moment, there are only 6 co-sponsers on the bill. These are:

Rep. Jones, Walter B., Jr. [R-NC-3]
Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Rep. Smith, Jason [R-MO-8]
Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
Rep. Duncan, John J., Jr. [R-TN-2]
Rep. Gaetz, Matt [R-FL-1]

start calling these people right now. flood their phones with dissent. don’t let them hear the end of it. make them kill their own bill before it even gets off the ground. 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193/text

dog-of-ulthar:

Trump is an awful person, but he isn’t a competent politician.  Pence is possibly a worse person and a very competent politician.  There is already a conservative plan to impeach Trump so Pence can take the presidency.  

A Pence presidency probably has less chance of accidental nuclear war, but a much greater chance of extremely socially conservative legislation which would be devastating to civil rights in America.  Trump just wants to make money and feel important; Pence has an agenda.

Nixon was impeached for corruption.  We already know Trump is corrupt.  Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about inappropriate sexual conduct.  We already know Trump has lied about inappropriate sexual conduct.

It’s only a matter of time before he lies about something too big for his press aids to smooth over and Congress gets to have his way with him, because he is a mess of a man and makes mistakes, and makes them loud.

If Pence is allowed to take his place, Pence will not make the same mistakes.

Pence is a career politician.  He’s well-spoken.  He’s relatively attractive.  His positions are clear and well-established.  He has a law degree.  He’s on the conservative end of Republicans, but he’s a committed member of the party.  In everything that made Trump unpopular among Republicans as well as Democrats, Pence is the opposite.

There were jokes comparing Trump to Emperor Palpatine, and a good rebuttal of them.  Compared to Pence, Trump is Jar-Jar Binks.  Pence is Palpatine.

Trump is wildly unpopular because both liberals and the Republican establishment don’t like him.  He’s ugly and crass and obviously incompetent, he’s the perfect figurehead to rally against.

Pence is not.  Pence is dangerous in different ways, and one of the worst is that he won’t make nearly as good a symbol for his opponents.  If Trump gets kicked out, we have to keep protesting, even as people try to say that we got what we wanted, that everything can go back to normal.  

Remember this, when the impeachment happens, whether it’s a month from now or three years.  Trump is bad.  Pence might be worse.