acemindbreaker:

freedom-of-fanfic:

shipping-isnt-morality:

ladyoftheteaandblood:

shipping-isnt-morality:

I’ve debated for a while about sharing this, but I think it’s important, and, to be fair, plenty of antis have shared the stories of their abuse.

So:

I support people creating romantic content similar to my abuse, even though that content contributed to my abuse.

Let me explain. I was very, very into Twilight when I was around 14. A couple years later a girl called me her lamb, and used the romanticization of jealousy and danger from that novel to excuse things like cutting me, stealing my phone, and demanding my passwords. Among other things. This continued until the end of high school, and it ripped apart every significant relationship in my life without anyone really realizing what was happening.

It’s definitely true that I didn’t recognize jealousy as abuse instead of romance. It’s true that I didn’t recognize “I love you” and “you can’t love anyone but me” as contradictions, and a part of that mentality came from the media I consumed. And she sure as fuck sent me fic – even forced me to write fic – which echoed those values. On a very base level, it is easy to blame my abuse on that fiction, on the unhealthy ideas of romance it gave me. For several years after getting out, I did blame romance like Twilight. I got angry when people I loved enjoyed it, and I thought I was protecting them by demanding that they stop.

But I was wrong.

Let me go out another level.

First of all, I grew up in a deeply homophobic town. There were exactly no adults in my life that I could have even told that I was in a relationship with a girl, let alone that I thought something was wrong. Abuse thrives in silence.

Second of all, I’d been homeschooled most of my life, which meant I had zero education on healthy relationships. I had no context outside of romance novels and fan fiction, which no adults knew I was reading. My view of romance was shaped by media because there were no other sources even trying to compete.

Third of all – and maybe this is most important – writing that fanfic, while in that situation, gave me a voice to things that I couldn’t even admit I was feeling. I wrote fic where a human loved a vampire, but they were scared, they were so scared, it felt like having a gun to their head all the time. They were so scared even as they loved the vampire, and they wanted them, and they wanted to help, and they wanted to be better. (She didn’t like that fic.) It took years before I would call what I experienced abuse, or seek out resources for victims. But fiction gave me a voice right then, when I needed one most.

Media didn’t get me abused. A society which failed utterly at telling me what a healthy relationship looked like got me abused. Parents and teachers and authority figures who were wildly homophobic got me abused. Fiction contributed, but if it wasn’t Twilight, it would have been something else – hell, apparently she repeated the same pattern after me with 50 Shades, and then with Captain America (somehow). Because above all, my abuser got me abused. She used fiction as a tool, but it could have been anything. If I hadn’t read Twilight, it would have been Johnlock, or Drarry, or Russia/America. All those things had more than enough content which portrayed danger and jealousy as sexy.

Do I still read Twilight? Fuck no, it’s a huge trigger. But I’ve stopped blaming it for what happened, because it was never Twilight’s job to teach me about romance. Nor was it fandom’s job to tell me, “if someone actually terrifies you, that’s dangerous, even if it’s sexy. If you love someone but they’re hurting you, you need help, not to try to fix them.” What hurt me most wasn’t fiction; it was the silence from every other quarter.

Media isn’t education on healthy relationships. It can’t be, and it never will be. “Fan fiction made me think that this was ok” means that there were no voices in our lives that we trusted more than fanfiction telling us that it wasn’t okay.

There will always be media that abusers can twist to make it look like what they’re doing is romantic and okay. Always. The abuse is still their fault, and the inability to counter harmful messages is the silence of society’s fault.

I’ll leave you with this: after I got out, I continued reading fic that featured jealousy and possessiveness as something hot. Because I did think it was hot; I now just knew firsthand that it was a kink to only be indulged in controlled situations. Firsthand experience is the harshest teacher, but it does work.

I just tag my own fic that features jealousy and possessiveness as “#abusive behavior.” Because if there is another girl like me out there, being sent these fics by her abuser, stuck in a situation she doesn’t understand – well, if it wasn’t my fic, it’d be someone else’s. The kink’s going to keep on existing. But maybe she’ll see the tag and figure something out.

Fiction is a tool, and taking one tool away won’t stop an abuser, because fiction isn’t causing abuse. If it wasn’t fiction, it’d be something else.

Stop blaming fiction for the actions of a cruel person, and the silence of the people who should have been protecting you.

It hurts to lay the blame at the feet of those you love, but if we deny the problems we will never fix them.

Be safe. Be kind.

I understand that it’s not the fault of a fiction that others get abused BUT I can’t be the only person who feels that aiming a fiction at young girls/boys who are at a very susceptible age, marketing it as hot romance, as a beautiful romance, as exciting. Then doing the same with the films is totally unacceptable.

If we give our young people very bad veiws of what a healthy romance is in fiction and then fail to educate them via home or school what chance do they have.

My daughter read Twilight and 50 shares of grey (at 15), and because I have been talking to her and answering her questions (and there were lots) since she could talk. She could see them for what they were.( She gave me a lecture on why they were bad) Many males and females do not have this at home or at school, so how are they supposed to sort it out in their heads.

Personally, and I know it isn’t fashionable to have these thoughts, I think fiction does have a responsibility not it aim stuff like this at kids and to NSFW tag ect to let people know it’s not for under 18. Iam as I said old fashioned.

Hi! So, first of all: I totally agree that adult content should be tagged NSFW. I think that, overall, a clear distinction between content for adults and minors is a good thing in media and something that helps with a lot of issues.

I also agree, to a degree, that media marketed specifically at people under at a fairly young age needs to be held to more stringent standards than media marketed to people who are older. Based on the ratings systems that most countries have adopted, this is a pretty universal position.

However!

I wanted to use this as a bit of a launching off point, because

If we give our young people very bad veiws of what a healthy romance is in fiction and then fail to educate them via home or school what chance do they have

is a very good point. I stand by the idea that censoring media does relatively little, but does that mean we just abandon kids who don’t have the support in their home or school to learn about these things? Well, no. I don’t think it’s anybody else’s responsibility, per se, but I think a lot of us can relate to that situation and want to help, so I wanted to talk a little about some things that I do that I think can be actually helpful to kids in this position.

  • Get politically involved to support better sex education. A lot of these decision are made at a local level – some as small as at the school-board level – which means any participation has a big impact. Even if you’re a student – especially if you’re a student – this is something you can do right now. Here’s a real basic breakdown of how to do some district-level activism. While this doesn’t instantly help kids in the situation, comprehensive and accurate sex and relationship education in schools is the only long-term solution to this problem.
  • Support resources aiming to help kids that aren’t getting this information elsewhere. Planned Parenthood’s a common one; Scarleteen and Sex Etc. are two other sites specifically directed at teens that are lgbtq+ friendly and aimed at education.  If you know of an organization that’s working to educate teens about these things, support them.
  • Write meta. At the fandom & community level, I think that meta is one of the things that is the most underrated in this discussion. Meta is part of what helped me realize that what was depicted in Twilight – and therefore what had happened to me – was abuse. If you see abuse, or other problematic things, in fandom, I think putting together a well-structured argument for why you think that is one of the best tools available for education. (In the current fandom climate it might be necessary to put a disclaimer of “This isn’t meant as a condemnation of people who enjoy this media, but just a discussion of it” might be necessary. I don’t think that takes away from its power at all.)
  • Pay attention to how work is getting tagged. If you’re a consumer of “problematic” content, keep a close eye on the tagging being used in your community. Lots of people get sloppy after a while, if they’re posting a lot and used to only interacting within the community (myself included). Gentle reminders of “hey, this really should be tagged with [X]” from within the community are going to be way, way, way more effective than attacks from outside the community.

There’s a lot that can be done to help teens that aren’t getting the kind of education they need and deserve while at home; I just don’t really agree that restriction the kind of fictional content allowed to exist on public sites that allow adult content on the basis of “but what if young people get the wrong idea?” is an effective method of combatting this problem.

this post is such a good post.

one thing I’d add: 

recognize and talk about fiction in the context of the society it’s from. for instance, Twilight and 50 SoG both romanticize abusive relationships. However, they didn’t spring out of a vacuum. They were written, marketed, and praised as great romance stories because in America – the country where both stories were written – abusive relationships are treated as romantic in real life, and the possessive, overbearing, controlling behavior is proof of a man’s love, not warning signs of an abuser.

as visible, slightly removed depictions of what women/afab people are often told to want irl by all signs around them, Twilight and 50SoG were easy vehicles to abuse for abusers in fandom spaces. but they can also be a great vehicle for showing how disturbing and abusive these relationships actually are in reality. recognizing how stories like this are part of a whole can help young fandom members more clearly see how the real world pushes dangerous ideas, and how to avoid being hurt by them.

I feel like basically all of my concerns about Twilight and 50SoG would be solved if they’d been published with some sort of tag or disclaimer saying that the relationships depicted in those stories are abusive, and in the case of 50SoG that real BDSM is not like this.

If we could normalize AO3 style tagging as a thing that mainstream books have in the foreword or something, that’d be awesome. Although to be fair, I’m pretty sure Stephanie Meyer wouldn’t be willing to tag Twilight, and I’m guessing the same is true for whoever wrote 50SoG (I can’t remember the author’s name). But if editors went ‘hey, we won’t publish this unless it’s appropriately tagged’, that would be awesome.

arcturian:

enigma-boi:

enigma-boi:

“Being able to tell the difference between fiction and reality” is kinda… not the point. At all.

It’s a lousy argument that completely misses the point entirely. 

Cultivation theory, at it’s baseline, doesn’t say that consuming, say, violent media makes you wanna kill or hurt people. What cultivation theory IS is saying “the proliferation of excessive violent media can influence how the people who consume that media perceive about the world” ie a person with already violent tendencies might be more likely to act on those violent tendencies because, due to the sheer glut of violent media, violence might seem more acceptable than it actually is culturally. 

And this shit is subconscious, you can’t say you’re not affected by it because “you know the difference between fiction and reality”, because often time you don’t actively register that it IS influencing you.

Or, in the case of many ads, you do know it’s trying to influence you and you put up guard walls – but that burger on screen DOES look delicious and the Burger King is only down the road so why not grab something to eat?

The decline of sharks due to Jaws is people perceiving the sharks as inherently dangerous to human and, thus, to keep people safe, need to be culled.

The rise of the KKK in the late 1910′s and early 20′s was due to Birth of a Nation portraying the KKK as sympathetic and cool.

The decline of the KKK in the 40s can be attributed to their mocking portrayal Superman radio serials.

This shit all matters.

This shit is all people being influenced by fiction even if they can acknowledge that fiction isn’t reality.

To expand and reiterate.

Yes, not everyone is going to be affected by cultivation theory the same way or in some cases, even at all. This varies from individual to individual and from society to society, and the effects of said “cultivation” can be stronger or weaker, once again, depending on the individual. To name the name of one of the most famous studies on the subject “Some Genres have Some Effect on Some People”.

However

When content is consumed by thousands, or in the case of big budget stuff, millions. “Some Genres have Some Effect on Some People” has a non insignificant chance of impacting society.

And just because you know this, and can tell yourself “Pfft, I’M not being affected! It’s only IDIOTS and KIDS who get affected by this stuff!”

You’re not as ironclad and immune as you think.

The third-person effect is a very real and prevalent type of cognitive dissonance. Sometimes people who say “I’m immune to being influenced by media” are the ones being influenced the most.

Women’s Hockey Must Exploit Changing Broadcasting Landscape

yolowoho:

The coverage of women’s sports is being revolutionized right before our eyes, and these women’s leagues are on the cutting edge of technology. While the men dominate network TV coverage, women have been forced to find alternate ways to put eyes on their sport, and it couldn’t have come at a more advantageous time.

Continue Reading

Women’s Hockey Must Exploit Changing Broadcasting Landscape

velocicrafter:

markingatlightspeed:

cyanwrites:

iammyfather:

evilelitest2:

petitepenquin:

mehofkirkwall:

disputedthreshermaw:

natrsrants:

deadcatwithaflamethrower:

jadedhavok:

randomthingsthatilike123:

gweatherwax:

awesomonster:

obese-starving-artist:

the-treble:

nowyoukno:

Source for more facts on your dash follow NowYouKno

That was super nice of them.

And now I’m mad that nobody told us we were given cows. Cause that’s really f*cking nice and nobody mentioned it at all.

American media tends to disregard that anyone donates to the US. And then Amurricans complain about money going abroad because “nobody helped the US in our disasters.”

>.>

Also, do you know how much a cow costs? O.O

It isn’t just a matter of how much a cow costs, its a matter of considering that Masai life is based around their cattle. Its their wealth, their food, and a significant part of their religion. Here’s a quote from Wikipedia:

“Traditional Maasai lifestyle centres around their cattle which constitute their primary source of food. The measure of a man’s wealth is in terms of cattle and children. A herd of 50 cattle is respectable, and the more children the better. A man who has plenty of one but not the other is considered to be poor.[37] A Maasai religious belief relates that God gave them all the cattle on earth, leading to the belief that rustling cattle from other tribes is a matter of taking back what is rightfully theirs, a practice that has become much less common.[38]

So its not just “they gave us 14 cows”, its that they gave us something that is very important and significant to them, it is more than just a kind gesture that definitely deserves to be known and its a genuine shame that more people don’t know about it.

Wait, you guys DON’T KNOW that we offer help to the US when you have disasters???????

Shit, down here in Brazil we not only offered to send tracking units and doctors to help in 9/11 but we wanted to send a whole lot of donations to help with Katrina (we have experience with floods down here so we knew what kind of medicine to send to prevent outbreaks). 

We alone had like 2 army airplanes full of medicine and non-perishables like baby formula, diapers, bottled water, mosquito nets and other stuff that’s needed to fight opportunistic diseases that hit flooded areas, enough to assist a good few thousand people at least, ready to go the day after it hit, but your government refused the donations

The same thing happened to the Canadians and Europeans who offered help, the US embassies around the world told us all to give money to Red Cross.

And so we did, we all gave hundreds of millions of dollars to them, and then this happened:

Red Cross scandals tarnish relief efforts

‘Breathtaking’ Waste and Fraud in Hurricane Aid

So please, don’t you go spreading misinformation and prejudice against the rest of the world, WE DID OFFER HELP AND ORGANIZED IT EVEN FASTER THAN BUSH DID, BUT Y’ALL REFUSED IT

Oh wow I had no idea this happened it’s really not talked about in media at all wow this is something good to know about wow

I’m so angry.

I didn’t know that other countries tried to help after 9/11 or Katrina. Like, that’s something we, the people, should hear about and we don’t.

Please don’t blame us for the shitty decisions our government makes. We don’t have as much control over our government as we would like to think and they keep a lot from us.

Spread this shit. 

After Katrina, Cuba donated several hundred blankets. Think about that. A country that is suffering economically due directly to the US embargo offered to help us when we needed it by sending what they could. And once again, it was refused. We have a government that is so self-righteous that we refuse to accept disaster aid in order to maintain this facade that we are the most generous nation on earth.

Okay, Katrina thing.

Only Texans really knows this? and even then it’s not wide spread.
Mexico sent their army.
They sent their army for relief efforts. Didn’t call ahead, they drove all the way to San Antonio with doctors and food and all sorts of supplies.

When people actually got a call from them saying “Hey, we’re sending people up.”
The people who answered said “What? We can’t…”
“Too late, already there.”
This was while the government was turning down help.

So yeah, other countries send relief.

Forest fires up in Washington last year? Firefighters from Australia came up to assist.

Like… we don’t hear about this shit. At all.

I can second the above with the fires. 

Most the time, when people say “oh FEMA or something sent people right?” re: fires, its actually people from other countries showing up and kinda ignoring the government telling them to fuck off and staying on behalf of local departments because we REALLY need them. 

If there’s a huge ass disaster, and the government is sitting there with a thumb up it’s ass, help is offered and most the time– shit, it gets there!
But then the feds do something really fucking dirty.
They insist they were the help, if it’s talked about at all. 

They insist those people putting out fires were federal people, because to most people a fireman’s a fireman. The people handing out water and food, a relief worker is a relief worker. So on and so forth. 

We had people come up when the fires were so bad a while ago– not the Australians, but i think there was like a German group of like 3 guys that flew themselves over? They came out of sheer “this is horrible and we’re helping” and my dad [local fire chief] had them working with our guys and the feds lost no time telling every news outlet that it was THEIR people doing all the fire knockdowns and structure work when these guys were running into buildings and grabbing people, pets, and people’s important documents because they knew papers were a pain in the ass to replace. 

What you gotta understand is that our government is very intent on selling us and the rest of the world [as much as possible] the idea of a powerful and self reliant country. All our reporting on disasters, starts with the scaremongering and then moves to “but our people can handle it because we’re the best at handling things” and then they move on before the idea it’s out of control comes to mind. The average person outside of the disaster has no idea, if they have never been around such an event or met someone who regularly deals with these things, they will kinda probably nod along with that. Because we have no real scope on the scale and impact– by design. Our media intake is very controlled to slant everything to the “eh, we can handle it and everyone else out there– they need our help because they’re not so good at handling disasters like we are.”
People who know better, reading international news, interacting with international social groups, looking outside their sphere of community– we know better but that kinda slant is really hard to break from because of that grip American media has on information.
So, taking that knowledge, we further have restricted reporting on certain disasters because they’re considered unimportant. 
Hurricanes are considered important, earthquakes are only considered important if it wrecks something the government cares about or somewhere a couple million people live that they’ll upset the national money flow/they can throw money at someone to make the news care, floods are only important if it’s in a similar manner to earthquakes but since they occur annually they’re rarely reported on nationally, mudslides that kill people or leave hundreds homeless aren’t important to the government even through they happen constantly, wildfires that consume most of the nation/continent each year generally are unimportant until they consume a town or threaten a government interest/money flow location.
Terrorist attacks are always important because people will talk about them.

So, when we do get help for any of the above, it’s possible that most people may have no idea about what’s happened, let alone that help’s been sent. Or if people know something happened, the details are vague– the news don’t care to give the nitty gritty. You’ll know something happened and people are suffering and “gee, isn’t it good you’re not them” and then now the weather.

So, yeah, basically no one really knows we get help.

International response to Hurricane Katrina:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina 

We got HELLA help, but nobody really talks about it

American Media really fails regularly 

Hurricane Sandy, Quebec sends power line crews down to assist in restoring power.  California gets rid of water bombers due to budget cuts, Canada sends theirs down to help fight wild fires. Amazing what living on the border and having outside TV News does to your information flow.

After Katrina, Denmark offered to donate water purification units so people wouldn’t get sick from drinking contaminated water, but the offer was declined.

A private Danish company built a mobile satellite phone booth and drove it around the poor neighbourhoods in Mississippi and Louisiana so people could call their families and insurance companies for free (apparently there was a deadline for reporting damages but people couldn’t call in because their mobile phones were dead and landlines were down).

American propaganda is not a thing of the past, nor is it a new thing. It has been around forever, telling stories of exceptionalism and self-reliance while our government tries its hardest to refuse the help of others and offer its own to them, to try and force other nations onto their back foot and remain aggressively benevolent in international matters, so that it can lord that shit over them in negotiations and the media in general.

I guarantee you America would have a less jingoistic, less xenophobic populace overall if this sort of information were actually reported to us. If we weren’t always fed the lie of helping the world without any gratitude or help in return. If the media didn’t present us as world police and instead as a part of the community, as other countries try hard to include us as, then maybe Americans would actually act like they’re part of a fucking community.

But global citizens are hard to monger fear and distrust and xenophobia and nationalism with. They’re hard to control with propaganda and hate. They’re hard to keep ignorant and docile and saying “this is fine” while the empire burns.

A lot of Americans wonder why our country is seen as a worldwide bully. Shit like that, my friends. Shit like that. Its hubris is seemingly limitless.

C O M M E N T A R Y

Why is everyone so excited that Phil Kessel is a Stanley Cup champion? Why him specifically?

hockeyknowitall:

Pretty sure this started in Toronto which is kind of funny. Basically Phil Kessel was on the Toronto Maple Leafs during some pretty bad years. And since Phil Kessel ws their perennial all star a lot of the blame fell on him. He was their talent and their top scorer but the team wasn’t winning so of course, it was their only good players fault. The media speifically attacked him at every angle they could. He was anti-social, he was rude, he was lazy and fat, he was a “coach-killer” ect. ect. Basically everything bad with the Leafs was ultimately Phil Kessel’s fault in the eyes of the media. It was getting so bad, the mild manner Kessel had a few blow ups at the media towards the end of his time in Toronto. 

There were some issues with Phil, you know the old white guy types who know what they’re talking about but they’re all fucking idiots. And people were throwing Leafs jerseys onto the ice after particularly bad and frustrating losses…and there were a lot of those. 

But through all of this most fans and Phil’s teammates stayed loyal to him. Phil loved/loves toronto, considers it home. When he won the stanley cup he brought it back here for his cup day. So there was a lot of love and loyalty still ther e when he was traded to the Penguins during the Leafs rebuild and Leafs fans wanted the pens to win just because of Phil.

So when Phil won the stanley cup and played a huge part in the Penguins success, Maple Leafs fans felt like it was a big fuck you to the media that was so detached from the actual climate of leafs fans. The guy who was the reason for the leafs failure was put on a good team and helped contribute towards that teams success. It was proof it wasn’t Phil’s fault the Leafs were bad. Which is obvious to anyone with common sense but the media does not have that capability.

Throwback to win Jonathan Toews in the midst of all this controversy drafted Phil Kessel first over all in the fantasy draft during the All Star Game and said it was because Kessel was “such a coachable player.” LIke that’s how stupid the media was through all of this. Even players who had nothing to do with them or the team they were covering, were making fun of them.

I’ve seen a lot of people say “Phil Kessel is a stanley cup champion” is a fuck you to the city of Toronto. but it’s not. He was loved here. it’s a fuck you to the media tire fire they have surrounding the Maple Leafs.

My time with Carrie Fisher, a hurricane of energy, charisma and foul language

laporcupina:

About a year ago I approached Carrie Fisher to write a column for the Guardian.
With other A-listers, it’s all too common to be rebuffed by several
layers of management, publicists and protective naysayers. But somehow –
all too easily – I found myself with an invitation to her house in
Beverly Hills.

And what a house it is. Huge neon arrows and signs hang from trees in
the driveway. It wasn’t Christmas, but a fully lit tree was the
centrepiece of her living room (it was there year-round). A giant moose
head with a fez hung above the fireplace; snow globes depicting macabre
murder scenes decorated the shelves and, outside in the garden, next to a
life-size Leia stepping out of a British telephone box, was the back
end of a lion attached to the wall, its raised tail revealing giant cat
balls.

Carrie was delayed, having spent the morning looking after her mum, Debbie Reynolds,
whose house is on the same grounds: a big “Debbie” made of light-bulbs
pointed the way to her property in their shared driveway. Reynolds had
suffered two strokes; she and her daughter saw each other nearly every
day. When Carrie finally appeared, she told me that Debbie, on hearing
they had a visitor, had assumed I was there to speak to her, as
Hollywood royalty, and declared: “I can’t see anyone.” Her daughter had
kept up the fiction.

I had been expecting maybe an hour of her time, but somehow we ended
up spending the entire day together: I was pressed to drink bottles of
wine she had picked for their rude or amusing names (she didn’t drink –
saying she couldn’t trust her addictive personality). We shopped, ate
homemade banana pudding out of the dish and plotted how we were going to
get her a boyfriend (her desire for companionship and sex were to
become a running theme).

We began chatting in her bedroom, the walls and ceilings decorated by
projections of fluttering butterflies. Gary – her French bulldog, whose
tongue steadfastly refuses to stay in his mouth – lay snoring next to a
Gary-themed gift director JJ Abrams had presented to Carrie at the wrap
party for Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

… read the whole thing. Really.

My time with Carrie Fisher, a hurricane of energy, charisma and foul language