Half of Americans Think Women Should Be Required by Law to Take Husband’s Name

socialjusticeichigo:

pleasuremasq:

socialjusticeichigo:

Jan 27 2017

Despite its archaic origins, the question of whether or not a woman should take on her husband’s last name remains relevant. Just ask any of your engaged friends. Researchers have found that more than 70 percent of US adults believe a woman should change her name, and approximately half felt that doing so should be required by law. A study, published in 2017 in Gender Issues, seeks to find out why this belief is so persistent.

“The most common reason (approximately 50 percent of the cases) given by individuals who advocated women’s name change was the belief that women should prioritize their marriage and their family ahead of themselves,” Emily Fitzgibbons Shafer, a sociology professor at Portland State University, notes in her study.

Shafer was interested in understanding how people perceived women based on their last name choice, and whether keeping one’s maiden name could cause backlash. More than 1,200 people from a national sample participated in her survey. Respondents were introduced in a randomly assigned vignette to the fictional Carol Sherman, Carol Sherman-Cook, or Carol Cook, who is married to Bill Cook: “Carol has been spending a lot of extra hours at her office job hoping for a promotion. Bill is starting to feel burdened by her absence, as he is picking up her slack in housework.” Respondents were then asked to rate how committed they thought Carol was to being a wife, and assess what standards they held her to. This was determined by answering how many days Carol’s husband should be okay with her working late per week (zero to five) and rating how justified he would be in divorcing her.

Shafer notes that her results were surprising. “Among women and highly educated men, women’s surname choice seems to have little effect on their perceptions of women as a wife or the standards to which she is held in marriage.” Low-educated men, however, thought a woman who chose a different last name from her husband’s was less committed to the marriage and that her husband would be more justified in filing for a divorce “for her perceived neglect of the marriage (as measured through repeated lateness),” she writes.

it’s a reflection of our cultural views, that women should put their families ahead of themselves: a view that we don’t have for men.

It’s important to understand how people view marital name choices because those attitudes speak to gender attitudes in general, Shafer says. “On a larger level,” she tells Broadly, “there is a body of literature that shows that when women act too agentic—which is to say they act too much like men in the workplace, they act in their own self-interest, if they’re not warm, if they’re good managers—they face backlash in the workplace context. My work shows that women can face backlash at home as well if they’re not acting ‘properly’ as wives.”

Moreover, woman’s decision to take on her husband’s surname is far more than simply a name change, Shafer points out. If that were the case, she says, “why don’t we see even a sizeable minority of men changing their names to their wives’? We still see that it’s the vast majority of women doing it… Clearly, it’s a reflection of our cultural views, that women should put their families ahead of themselves: a view that we don’t have for men.”

When asked what it’s going to take for women to be able to make their own choice—whether they have to do with surnames, reproductive rights, or what have you—without fear of backlash, Shafer says her “pessimistic answer is dismantling the patriarchy.”

Until then, “there’s great work that points to when it’s economically beneficial to women to do things, then people start to accept it,” she continues. “Most people accept that [women] can both work and be a good mom at the same time. That’s because the vast majority of women do it now. Maybe it takes a certain amount of women to do a certain act before people start to accept it.”

If more women simply kept their last names when they got married, Shafer adds, “people would see it as normalized.”

If you think this is depressing…remember that 50 years ago, not taking your husband’s name was seen as “wrong” by the vast majority–well over 50%–of the population.

Amelia Earhart scandalized many, many people when she refused to take up her husband’s name when she married.  (Among other groundbreaking things she did, like being bisexual and polyamorous.)

I guess I just thought (or hoped) we were further along on this shit by now.

Half of Americans Think Women Should Be Required by Law to Take Husband’s Name

greenandhazy:

little bit of Jewish history: for several centuries, Jews didn’t have fixed, hereditary surnames. they went by “Name son of Father” or similar. Ashkenazi Jews mostly didn’t start taking on surnames until the 18th and 19th century, when surnames were made a condition of being recognized as citizens of modern nations. and apparently there was one Jew in Germany who thought hey, if we’ve got to take it a surname, let’s make it a damn good one.

so this is the name he picked:

Wolfe­schlegel­stein­hausen­berger­dorff­welche­vor­altern­waren­gewissen­haft­schafers­wessen­schafe­waren­wohl­gepflege­und­sorg­faltig­keit­be­schutzen­vor­an­greifen­durch­ihr­raub­gierig­feinde­welche­vor­altern­zwolf­hundert­tausend­jah­res­voran­die­er­scheinen­von­der­erste­erde­mensch­der­raum­schiff­genacht­mit­tung­stein­und­sieben­iridium­elek­trisch­motors­ge­brauch­licht­als­sein­ur­sprung­von­kraft­ge­start­sein­lange­fahrt­hin­zwischen­stern­artig­raum­auf­der­suchen­nach­bar­schaft­der­stern­welche­ge­habt­be­wohn­bar­planeten­kreise­drehen­sich­und­wo­hin­der­neue­rasse­von­ver­stand­ig­mensch­lich­keit­konnte­fort­pflanzen­und­sicher­freuen­an­lebens­lang­lich­freude­und­ru­he­mit­nicht­ein­furcht­vor­an­greifen­vor­anderer­intelligent­ge­schopfs­von­hin­zwischen­stern­art­ig­raum

and the fun doesn’t stop there. roughly translated, this name means “Ages ago, there were conscientious shepherds whose sheep were well tended and carefully protected against attack by their rapacious enemies. Twelve hundred thousand years ago there appeared before these first earthmen, at night, a spaceship powered by seven stone and iridium electric motors. It had originally been launched on its long trip into stellar space in the search for neighboring stars that might have planets revolving about them that were inhabitable and on which planets a new race of intelligent humanity might propagate itself and rejoice for life, without fear of attack by other intelligent beings from interstellar space.”

and then this gentleman’s great-great-grandson was given a 26-word “first name” featuring names beginning with each successive letter of the alphabet: Adolph Blaine Charles David Earl Frederick Gerald Hubert Irvin John Kenneth Lloyd Martin Nero Oliver Paul Quincy Randolph Sherman Thomas Uncas Victor William Xerxes Yancy Zeus.

but of course that’s impractical for everyday use, so he often went by the name Hubert B. Wolfe + 666, Sr. he was born in Germany in 1904 or 1914, emigrated to Philadelphia, and died in 1997.

there is no part of this that is not incredible to me.

lordxeras:

boostergold78:

the-art-of-yoga:

I didn’t know Mr. T pityed fool’s that weren’t woke, but that’s awesome. #respect

“I think about my father being called ‘boy’, my uncle being called ‘boy’, my brother, coming back from Vietnam and being called ‘boy’. So I questioned myself: “What does a black man have to do before he’s given the respect as a man?” So when I was 18 years old, when I was old enough to fight and die for my country, old enough to drink, old enough to vote, I said I was old enough to be called a man. I self-ordained myself Mr. T so the first word out of everybody’s mouth is “Mr.” That’s a sign of respect that my father didn’t get, that my brother didn’t get, that my mother didn’t get.“

-Mr. T on the subject of his name

Hey! So I’m getting ready to come out on my campus this year and I was wondering if you had any tips regarding talking to professors about the name change and pronouns. Or anything else that you feel might be helpful. Also I love u and ur blog k thnx bye

ardatli:

bisexualgambit:

I always send an email to my professors about a week before the semester starts that says this:

SUBJECT: Preferred Name

Body: 

Dear [PROFESSOR’S PREFIX AND LAST NAME],
My name is [YOUR FIRST AND LAST NAME], and I will be attending your course [COURSE TITLE] on [DAYS OF CLASS] at [TIME OF CLASS] this semester. I am transgender and have not yet legally changed my name. On your roster is my name is [LEGAL NAME]. I would greatly appreciate it if you refer to me as [PREFERRED NAME] and use [PREFERRED PRONOUNS] when referring to me. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to starting your course this week.
Sincerely,
[PREFERRED FULL NAME]

Also, look into seeing if your school has a preferred name policy! My school just implemented one last August! It still has some loose bolts so I email my professor’s still anyway but it can be helpful on school IDs and such!

As a prof, this is both overkill and perfect – very polite and very thorough.

I only say ‘overkill’ because I get a lot of email in August and September and would be happy with something that got to the point a little faster: 

Dear Professor [name],

I’m in your [course number or title] class, [section number if applicable] this semester. My name on official documents is [legal name], but I would greatly appreciate it if you would use [preferred name] and [preferred pronouns]. 

Thanks for your understanding, [etc.]

I don’t need to know why, unless someone is comfortable disclosing. I just need to respect it. 

(I’ve even had “hey, my name on the list is [name] but I go by [name] and [pronouns] instead. cool?” … But I teach in a very informal department, and while I was fine with it, I wouldn’t actually recommend that course of action as a first contact. XD ) 

nevaehtyler:

A message to teachers who refuse to pronounce the names of their students of color correctly. 

In a new video, Adam Levine-Peres, an educator in the Bronx, talks about the importance of teachers, especially white teachers, learning how to pronounce the names of Black and Brown students properly. He says pronouncing the students’ names correctly “will go along way in the classroom”, otherwise there might be lack of trust, students might end up giving up on things like their teacher gave up on saying their name the right way.

Full video
Follow Adam on Twitter @projectbronx

#EthnicNames

elevenses-on-trenzalore:

zemedelphos:

vagabondaesthetics:

thefemaletyrant:

generalbriefing:

So….I totally never thought about this. I’m sure very few of you have. I don’t know about you, but I’m a bit disturbed…

Wow. Food for thought. I’m sure there’s an answer though.

Their names were translated/Anglicized after going from Greek to English.

The names of the Apostles are of Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew origins. The Hebrew, Aramaic and “Greek” named Apostles were:

Shim’on = Simon (Hebrew origin).

Y’hochanan = John (Hebrew origin).

Mattithyahu = Matthew (Hebrew origin).

Ya’aqov = James (Hebrew origin meaning Jacob).

Bar-Tôlmay = Bartholomew (Aramaic, which is related to Hebrew).

Judah = Jude / Saint Jude (not to be confused with Judas Iscariot, Hebrew origin).

Yehuda = Judas Iscariot (Hebrew origin, Betrayed Yeshua/Yehosua the Messiah).

Cephas / Kephas = Peter (Hebrew / Aramaic origin meaning “Rock”).

Tau’ma = Thomas (Aramaic origin).

Andrew = Andrew (Greek origin. Is the brother of Cephas / Kephas).

Phillip = Phillip (Greek origin).

You will note that there are only 11 names, that is because there were 2 Apostles named Ya’aqov (James), which brings the total to 12 apostles.

Link 

To expand on this, Jesus’s name is Anglicized in this way as well. We get Jesus from the Latin form of the Greek “Ἰησοῦς”(Iēsous), which is derived from the Herbrew “ישוע”(Yeshu’a, which meant “YHWH is Salvaion”, YHWH, or Yahweh being the name of God). When another form of that name, ” יְהוֹשֻׁעַ”(Yeoshu’a) was allowed to Anglicize through a different set of corruptions, it entered the English Language through Reformist Protestants as the name “Joshua”.

Yes. Jesus’s actual name is Joshua.

joshua christ this is fascinating

a-daks:

weatheredlaw:

weatheredlaw:

i taught swim lessons and preschool, do y’all wanna hear the most ridiculous white kid names i’ve ever seen?

  • i’ve met at least a dozen children named some form of “jackson” but the best ones were “jaxon” and “jakson” 
  • a parent who i really liked named her son “jaycob” because she was worried people wouldn’t pronounce it correctly. when someone accidentally spelled it “jacob” she would loudly and obnoxiously ask “WHO’S JAH-KOBE?” 
  • two siblings named “thor” and “tiara”
  • i once had a classroom with four girls named “brooklyn”
  • if you sent me a list of popular boy names, i could guarantee i’ve met every single one of them
  • twin girls named paisley and brinley
  • a girl named reader
  • a boy named rocko
  • keighleey
  • kayde
  • kolten
  • if it can start with a “k” instead of a “c” i have met that child
  • brittalynn 
  • i taught a swim class with three girls named “london” but only one of them was spelled “lundon” and i know my boss did that to me on purpose
  • a couple named all their kids after places in arizona: tatum, payson, and hayden
  • and speaking of hayden, i’ve seen: haydon, heighden, and heydon 
  • according to some white people, there are sixteen different ways to spell mckenzie
  • lakelyn, blakelynn 

this is white culture

twistedingenue:

digitaldiscipline:

carrigerpigeon:

sonneillonv:

carrigerpigeon:

‘Ulf’  derives from the Old Norse word for “wolf” (úlfr). Saldalius is Latin for “true wolf”.

So we’ve literally got Mr. Wolf Wolf from Messrs. Wolf, Wolf, Wrendofflip, and Wolf fighting Randolph Lyall, whose first name derives from the Old Norse “

Rannúlfr” which literally breaks down to shield + wolf, and his last name “Lyall” also means wolf. 

So basically the fight in Blameless was Professor Wolf Wolf vs. Mr. Wolf Wolf and Professor Wolf Wolf only won because his Alpha, Lord Wolf Wolf of Woolsey (Conall meaning strong wolf and Maccon meaning son of a wolf), came to fuck Mr. Wolf Wolf’s shit up in a drunken backyard brawl. 

Gail Carriger, everybody. 

This is just a blatant attempt to outdo JK Rowling

It gets better. Pretty much all the other werewolf characters in that series have Wolf Wolf names, too. 

image

Major Wolf Wolf of the Chesterfield Wolves (Channing means Wolf)

Noble Wolf Bluebutton (Adelphus is a variant Old German ‘Adalwolf’)

Hemming: derived from hamr “shape”, and possibly originally a nickname for a person believed to be a shape changer.

Phelan: anglicization

of an Irish surname for “wolf" 

Rafe:  English name meaning “Shield wolf

Ulric:  Middle English form of the Old English name Wulfric meaning “wolf power”

Jury is out on Quinn and Riehard, but I think Riehard is a pseudonym anyway, and his last name has the word bark in it, so let’s be real

Zev: Zariation for the Hebrew for Wolf

Sandalio de Rabiffano: Sandalio is  the latinized form of the Gothic name Sandulf which meant “true wolf”

and NOT PICTURED, werewolves Sidheag Maccon and Vulkasin Woolsey, whose full names both also mean Wolf Wolf.

of what am I the youngest member?

The London werewolf pack, of course.

oh….we need to introduce you to Gail’s books, don’t we.