I feel like one of the biggest misconceptions out there is that all fanfic is written by 12 and 13 year olds
Like the other day I read a fanfic where Jason Todd is remodeling his kitchen and is concerned about wooden countertops because what if you get raw chicken on your wooden countertop?
You think a 13 year old thinks about countertops? Think again my friend that fic was written by an Adult
Somebody tag sacrificethemtothesquid for me please
fIRST OF ALL, wood countertops WARP unless done properly and oiled regularly, but raw chicken on a wood countertop would pose the same risk as raw chicken on anything else. There are studies I can’t be bothered to cite that indicate the enzymes and structure of wood cutting boards make them be more effective for sanitation than plastic or stone, so that would probably hold true for countertops as well.
A good butcher block will last approximately forever if looked after. Personally, I did concrete for our countertops and I flipping LOVE them. Super cheap (like $100 of Henry Feather Finish over existing ugly-but-serviceable laminate) and looks like soap stone.
So. Your fic may be written by a twelve-year-old, but there’s a good chance that that twelve-year-old is cleverly disguised as a thirty-year-old remodeler who aggressively armchair-quarterbacks HGTV.
illiterate dairy maid in 1750, hundreds of years before germ theory was even thought of: because of my exposure to cowpox, im immune to smallpox. if we expose people to cowpox, they won’t die of smallpox
upper middle class college educated mother with internet living in the year of our lord 2018: vaccines are the devils handiwork and a conspiracy i’d rather my child die of polio than be the autism
people today with access to more raw information than any other period: the earth is flat
german artilleryman in 1916, who barely washes his own ass: I need to account for the curvature and rotation of the earth when plotting my firing plans
Eratosthenes, an Egyptian, in 3750 BC when fucking mammoths hadn’t even gone extinct yet: Oh hey I can use these two obelisks to calculate the earth’s entire circumference based on
the length of their shadows
and the Earth’s curvature. Neat.
Erastothenes was born in 276 BCE.
The last mammoth died on in island off the northeast coast of Siberia in ~1650BCE.
And as I’ve pointed out previously, the Coriolis effect was known even earlier than that, although it may not have become important to gunnery.
I find it utterly bizarre that humans saw these megafauna.
“
In fact, the Wrangel mammoth’s genome carried so many detrimental
mutations that the population had suffered a “genomic meltdown,”
according to Rebekah Rogers and Montgomery Slatkin of the University of
California, Berkeley.
Analyzing the Swedish team’s mammoth data at the
gene level, they found that many genes had accumulated mutations that
would have halted synthesis of proteins before they were complete,
making the proteins useless, they report Thursday in PLOS Genetics.
“
That
“genomic meltdown”
is one of the reasons feminism is so potentially lethal, because they keep pushing for asexual reproduction, or trying to combine ovaries, when the most likely outcome is a population running about – unable to reproduce sexually since the whole “male genocide” bit – with incredibly damaged chromosomes.
Sex exists for a reason, and no, “because it’s fun” is not the answer,
sorry. It works better than reproduction otherwise. Which is why every
complex species uses it.
Intelligence requires a lot of things to be working correctly, and if you have an all female species that is over the tipping point of idiocy, then there won’t be enough people to maintain the technology to continue to reproduce. And humans will go the way of the
Wrangel
beasties.
Fortunately, feminists are horribly lazy bastards, so i doubt they’ll continue to get their way, but it does made for a decent plot for a dystopian fiction…
What …the fuck?
That went off the rails so suddenly like I thought I was just gonna learn something cool about mammoths and then WHOA.
I scrolled past this thinking “the earth is round, yes, something, something, mammoths…’
But the second time it came past I saw
That “genomic meltdown” is one of the reasons feminism is so potentially lethal
And I think I got whiplash from that pivot. I also laughed so hard that I couldn’t breathe.
I’m????
Point and laugh at the MRA, kids.
How … does he think … mammoths reproduced …
Never mind, not sure I want to know.
reblog to support Mammoth Feminism,
ignore for G E N O M I C M E L T D O W N
I here af for my Feminist Mammoth ladies, bring the species back!
DOWN WITH GENOMIC MELTDOWN
I… what exactly is combining ovaries supposed to achieve? 400 lazy feminist babies at the same time?
Shhhh…you weren’t supposed to tell anyone.
FEMINISM KILLED THE MAMMOTHS
I feel like we’re getting away from the main point here, which is that the world is flat
the world is only flat because it was trampled by feminist mammoths
reblog if you support your army of genetically-melted feminist mammoths that trampled the earth flat
Don’t anybody tell this guy about that species of lizard where there are only females it might break him
That “genomic meltdown” is one of the reasons feminism is so potentially lethal, because they keep pushing for asexual reproduction, or trying to combine ovaries, when the most likely outcome is a population running about – unable to reproduce sexually since the whole “male genocide” bit – with incredibly damaged chromosomes.
I teach genetics, I don’t deserve to have to explain why this is so wrong and yet. Oh my god.
Mueller’s Ratchet–which is what this chucklefuck is talking about, the reason that purely asexual lineages don’t last well in evolutionary time–does not apply to feminism. The hypothetical scenario of merging two eggs to create a baby? Yeah, uh, that’s fucking sex in this context, whether or not it involves a male.
There are zero feminists pushing for parthenogenesis for humans, mostly because the whole thing is basically impossible for mammals as a result of mammalian investment in genomic imprinting. Among other things. It’s the sort of thing that only works okay in species that don’t control their embryonic development anywhere near as closely as your basic placental mammal does, because it relies on a certain amount of flexibility about sex determination and placental mammals are kind of weird about that.
Even if there were, Mueller’s Ratchet only applies if you never ever sexually reproduce and reshuffle alleles, like the parthenogenetic whiptail lizards mentioned upthread. If we have the technology to induce parthenogenesis in a human woman, we have the technology to reshuffle some alleles now and again. Mueller’s Ratchet kind of presupposes that going in and manually editing a genome isn’t a fucking option, shitwad!
Furthermore, Mueller’s Ratchet is specifically a population genetics phenomenon that refers to the accumulation of deleterious mutations within an asexually/clonally reproducing lineage. It has dick fuck all to do with chromosomes.
Mueller’s Ratchet exists in order to explain why asexually reproducing lineages haven’t overrun the world, because frankly in the short term these lineages usually do way better than their conspecific, obligate sexually reproducing partners do. Furthermore, it’s really fucking common to see species that reproduce sexually at some times and asexually at other times, depending on context and who’s available, and that’s in and of itself a complex fucking phenotype you species-centric cortically starved ignorant dillweed
all of this is completely fucking irrelevant to the mammoth example that @brett-caton there chose to bring up, by the way, because mammoths don’t fucking reproduce asexually either
as you would know if you’d bothered to read the paper, you self-satisfied jellyfish fellator
or even the pop science article you cited yourself
which clearly and cogently explains that the fucking mammoths died of being inbred as all shit, much like yourself
the laziness inherent in jumbling all this pig-ignorant, overconfident and understudied bullshit together and claiming it’s a solidly built house rather than a crumbling, confused pile of enraged starfish is the final straw
you can’t even be arsed to read an article that you dug up and cited yourself, you shithugger
how are feminists supposed to be the lazy ones?
you obviate your own thesis with your own intellectual failure, you pathetic snailsucking weed in the garden of knowledge
I reblogged this before but I have to do so again because of the above takedown with its glorious insults. Also, it’s always fun to point and laugh at MRAs.
I am in awe.
i knew someone was going to shoot holes in that cockamamie theory eventually
Referring back to @sapper-in-the-wire‘s OP: what we’re seeing right now (handily re-illustrated by the random MRA dreck in the middle of this reblog chain) is the consequences of unfettered read-write access to massive quantities of raw information by people who do not have the skills to sort through or interpret it.
This is the crisis of our time, and critical thinking education is desperately necessary.
Or, honestly, even just more awareness of the fact that our processing capacities are being constantly overwhelmed and people are using this to take advantage of each other would help a lot.
‘you self-satisfied jelly fish fellator’ is my new favourite phrase
I feel like so many of us have wanted to see professional athletes, especially Olympians, ‘swap jobs’ to see what skills would transfer. This is great because a diver and a gymnast teach each other the basics of their trade, and it’s scientifically of interest, it’s all for science, there’s nothing about fit men or accents, it’s just, it’s science, okay, it’s sports, it’s athleticism and science and
This has now gotten reblogged by at least one porn sideblog, and honestly, that’s fair
Best part of this is their excitement to share their discipline and the utter delight when the other does well in it
Disney Ladies + Science (& “Science”). Thanks to our followers for ideas.
Yes, textile engineer. That’s not a fashion designer in any way.
You’ve obviously not watched the movie. She invented those fabrics to resist flame, turn invisible, resist high amounts of friction, and stretch infinite times, and avoid tear from bombs
she did a tad more than “design” them
(Id go so far as to say “tactical textile engineer”
And since the fabrics have to be comfortable as well, she’s a tactile tactical textile engineer.
And since the uniforms also had to look stylish and not gaudy, she’s a tasteful tactile tactical textile engineer.
And since she was making suits for superheroes of color in the 50′s she’s a tolerant tasteful tactile tactical textile engineer
There are two bones in your lower leg. One’s big and buff and one’s pretty wimpy. When you walk, that big tibia takes ~80% of your weight of impact, and the fibula only has to take the remaining 20%.
But skaters place their weight differently over their feet. In principle a hockey player has 100% of their weight shifted forward onto their tibia.
You can actually see the implications of this in practice. If you break your fibula, 20% of the weight-bearing is gone, and you won’t really be able to walk. But a hockey player who cracks their fibula can and will keep skating almost without noticing something’s wrong. This happens pretty damn often when they block shots. You’ll see them skate easily over to get checked out, step up onto the hallway floor, and then suddenly slump over, with medical staff helping them limp off down the hallway.
I hear people saying, “oh, guess he’s fine!” when hockey players get up and appear to be skating okay: nah. And when a player wants to return to the ice: they may genuinely feel better skating but be too injured to walk.
And over time, if you’re in the weight-bearing position for skating more often than walking, and are skating from a young age, yes, that affects the shape of your weight-bearing bones and external appearance of your legs and feet. I don’t have a survey on hockey players’ shapely ankles compared to the normal population in front of me at the moment, but every single skater I see could be identified by their ankles
I thought this was going to be someone condescendingly explaining hockey to me but this is so informative and well written and I trust you with all my bones now.
Someone please source this, it’s too beautiful to not have sources
i can sort of provide some more explanation, maybe? note that all of my skating experience comes from taking figure skating lessons and that i am absolutely not a physiologist/sports science-person.
@brainsandbodies This wasn’t my original post, so I’m sorry I didn’t see you asking for sources earlier. All of you asking for sources here are very cool, and I wanted to round up what I can for you. If I forget somebody’s question, please just @ or ask me. But this also struck me because I think one of the most important things to remember about health is:
basic professional knowledge is often hard to cite and hard to make accessible
Hang with me for a sec.
This happens to be the story that got me into sports med. I’d just lost my parents; fuck knows what I was doing but I knew I needed to make up credit hours and I already had an EMT-B, so I signed up three weeks late for SM 136: Emergency Care, the first class I ever planned to sleep through. I remember coming in late for my first (late) day and seeing a lot of snapbacks in the room. It was taught by a small, sweet-faced man who used to train the Philadelphia Phillies: he’d fly down with the team to Tampa for spring training, so he got to know the head trainer for the Tampa Bay Lightning, and they got to gossiping about the shit their clients put them through.
When he got bored of baseball he left the Phillies, and moved up here to hockey country. He wanted to see some skaters break their legs.
He dragged us through the fundamentals of weight-bearing step by step, and you could see him light the fuck up: you just knew he was getting to something gross.
“So that’s how hockey players can break their own legs,” he said, stopping right by my desk, “and not even know it until they step off the ice. Fine, fine, and then—“ he made a wet sort of crunching noise. Whoever was under the snapback next to me gagged. I was hooked. I said, I believe, “COOL,” full-volume, and he met my eye, nodding with the full solemn grandeur of the wicked awesomeness of physiology.
You’re wondering: I got my first snapback that week.
Here’s the thing:
The fibula was found to bear about 6.4% of your weight when in a neutral ankle position in 1984. At the time the experiment had to be done with autopsy specimens and in simple positions (Takebe, Nakagawa, Minami, Kanazawa, Hirohata,1984). Since then we’ve seen that in the more complex positions of a standard heel-toe walking gait, the fibula typically carries about to 10-15% of a person’s weight and the tibia takes 80%. (It doesn’t add up because there are other tissues involved and the two bones work to stabilize each other.) 80% is the conventional approximation we’re taught in classes, that appears in biomedical textbooks, and that’s used in practice by therapists.
Most of the muscles of your calf and ankle attach to your fibula, so your fibula is all wrapped up snug in a bunch of muscle, so it follows that it’s hard to break. The conventional knowledge in healthcare is that people who come in with broken fibulas are athletes or were in motor vehicle accidents or were physically abused because that’s what we observe.
The risk of breaking your fibula is a casual part of how we talk about shot-blocking, because we see it happen a lot. And the Tampa Bay trainers who work directly with individual players had seen them skate off what turned out to be a broken fibula; my professor had seen it happen; I’ve seen it happen. It’s something that we talk about in classes and look for on the ice. But it’s kind of hard to study beyond the players you personally get your hands on.
Greg Campbell skated on what turned out to be a broken right fibula back in 2013.
But the only reason we have the footage of it was that it was an obvious, severe break, so he was in visible pain, and later the specific injury was made public. In other cases they don’t look especially hurt until they hit the hall, and the injury isn’t shared. So I can’t tell you how often it happens in total, out of all the hockey players out there. That information isn’t gathered anywhere.
Sports medicine is a fascinating and a bit of a fucked up field to try to explain because we have to use observational data and case studies and conventional knowledge.
We can’t line up a bunch of hockey players and whack them in the legs to see what happens in real time, or compare them to a control group who didn’t get whacked.* We can’t wait for people to be injured and round them all up to study, because it’s an unpredictable accident, and we can’t ask players to skate with an injury—that’s what I like to call “un-the-fuck-ethical.”
We’re also limited in how much we can see inside a living skater while they skate! Right now—like right now—motion-capture and 3D modeling is exploding our understanding of biomechanics, and that will inform PT practice. (There’s a reason Mathews and McDavid and all the other monsters are here now; we’re just now figuring out how to train them like that.)
But it’s still difficult even to gather data on how or how often certain injuries happen to certain people beyond individual trainers’ clinical observations. It’s not a centralized system. We don’t have concussion reporting worked out yet!
And it’s hard because it’s hard to get money to research something that’s already Known.
All that means that sports medicine is something of a slow science: individual providers are using clinical judgement and observing to see what works and drawing on a body of knowledge about what has worked in the past to inform their treatment, but we can’t test or tell you a lot of things.
And that also makes it hard for people who don’t have that professional knowledge to access your own medical information. Because you need basics and context to interpret everything but that information is just in our heads.
Ideally, the point of the professional trainer is just to be efficient: they carry that body of knowledge and fish out what you need when you need it so you don’t have to sit through Human Anatomy & Physiology and SM 101 just to understand what your ankle is doing. In practice, the knowledge often bottlenecks there and it never gets to you.
So you want to search and ask for sources for medical information, but also keep in mind that not all our knowledge is available in a form you’re familiar with, and what is out there might need a lot of context.
@selasphorus-rufus is spectacular for jumping in to talk about edges: I skimmed over them here and got into it more in a couple replies, because apparently I sure misread the room and thought it would muddy things up.
“if you look at that leg diagram, the tibia is much closer to where the inner edge of the skate is, ergo hockey players would be positioning most of their weight on the tibia as it’s much easier to balance on the inner part of your foot when using the inner part of your foot”
This is a great way to start reading it, and the basic principle is on point.
How To Evaluate Figure Skating Injuries by Rachel Janowicz, DPM gives a quick summary of edgework and how it affects the entire leg; I’m limiting myself to the ankle because the good lord knows I need some limits here, (but you better believe skating-related bone changes work all the way up through your hips and back.)
It’s a little more complex because your ankle is complex. When you use your edges, the sole of your foot doesn’t stay flat and perpendicular to your leg bones: you lift up off the heel and onto the ball of your foot, and your tip the sole of your foot in or out, which is called pronation or supination. That creates an angle between your leg bones and your foot bones.
They’ve drawn a straight line, but his actual feet are slightly, distinctly tipped out as he strides. That supination make an angle with his tibia that makes his medial malleolus (the lumpy end fibula at the inside of your ankle) pop out.
(@angsversteuring and @ismellapples That’s what people are looking at. I also think it looks Completely Normal, but many people have much, much less malleolus, so it looks odd to them.)
The bone there is physically pushed out more. High-top “ankle supporting” skate boots put extra pressure on that prominent point of bone (Both hockey players and figure skaters now wear those, so @ineptshieldmaid and @luckyhorseshoecrab yes, both would see this. There are also other factors for figure skaters but I’m too far gone to get into it call me back and remind me later please). That stress as well as the stress of your strides on the angled bone causes increased bone growth, potentially forming bone spurs or bursae, which all adds to the aesthetic charm of your big honkin skater ankle (Smith, 1990; Luke & Micheli, 1999; Anderson, Weber, Steinbach, & Ballmer, 2004.
Smith, A. D. (1990). Foot and ankle injuries in figure skaters. Phys Sportsmed18(3):73-86.
Luke A. C., Micheli, L.J. (1999). Ankle Swelling – Figure Skating. Med Sci Sports Exercis 31(5):S87.
Anderson, S.E., Weber, M., Steinbach, L.S., Ballmer, F.T. (2004). Shoe rim and shoe buckle pseudotumor of the ankle in elite and professional figure skaters and snowboarders: MR imaging findings. Skeletal Radiology 33(6):325-329
Takebe, K., Nakagawa, A., Minami, H., Kanazawa, H., Hirohata, K. (1984). Role of the fibula in weight-bearing. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res. 184, 289–292
*I suppose we could let the Washington Capitals whack each other, but that would be a kinkier kind of science.